PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IJH vs. BKLN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IJH vs. BKLN

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

IJH (iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF) and BKLN (Invesco Senior Loan ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IJH is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Index, while BKLN is a Bank Loan fund tracking the Morningstar LSTA US Leveraged Loan 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IJH returned 11.12%/yr vs 4.25%/yr for BKLN. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IJH charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for BKLN.

Performance

IJH vs. BKLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) and Invesco Senior Loan ETF (BKLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IJH achieves a 12.55% return, which is significantly higher than BKLN's -0.04% return. Over the past 10 years, IJH has outperformed BKLN with an annualized return of 11.12%, while BKLN has yielded a comparatively lower 4.25% annualized return.

IJH

1D
0.22%
1M
0.16%
YTD
12.55%
6M
12.75%
1Y
22.98%
3Y*
15.01%
5Y*
7.86%
10Y*
11.12%

BKLN

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.43%
YTD
-0.04%
6M
0.55%
1Y
4.39%
3Y*
7.44%
5Y*
5.09%
10Y*
4.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IJH vs. BKLN - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IJH
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF		12.55%7.42%13.92%16.40%-13.11%24.72%13.60%26.10%-11.19%16.26%
BKLN
Invesco Senior Loan ETF		-0.04%6.88%8.21%12.53%-2.51%2.32%1.32%10.03%-1.32%2.13%

Correlation

The correlation between IJH and BKLN is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2011

0.49

The correlation between IJH and BKLN shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.59 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IJH vs. BKLN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
IJH
BKLN

Industrials

25.0%
0.8%

Technology

15.7%
5.8%

Financial Services

14.4%
2.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%
2.3%

Healthcare

8.6%
0.8%

Real Estate

7.5%
1.5%

Energy

5.5%

-

Basic Materials

4.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

3.8%
0.7%

Utilities

3.1%

-

Communication Services

1.0%
0.8%

Industrials

IJH
25.0%
BKLN
0.8%

Technology

IJH
15.7%
BKLN
5.8%

Financial Services

IJH
14.4%
BKLN
2.3%

Consumer Cyclical

IJH
10.7%
BKLN
2.3%

Healthcare

IJH
8.6%
BKLN
0.8%

Real Estate

IJH
7.5%
BKLN
1.5%

Energy

IJH
5.5%
BKLN

-

Basic Materials

IJH
4.8%
BKLN

-

Consumer Defensive

IJH
3.8%
BKLN
0.7%

Utilities

IJH
3.1%
BKLN

-

Communication Services

IJH
1.0%
BKLN
0.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF

Invesco Senior Loan ETF

Often compared with IJH:
IJH vs. VOIJH vs. IJRIJH vs. MDYIJH vs. IJJIJH vs. IJKIJH vs. SCHMIJH vs. IVOO
Often compared with BKLN:
BKLN vs. SRLNBKLN vs. HYGBKLN vs. FLBLBKLN vs. FTSLBKLN vs. USHYBKLN vs. SPYBKLN vs. EFT

Return for Risk

IJH vs. BKLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IJH
IJH Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
IJH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJH Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJH Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
IJH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJH Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
BKLN
BKLN Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
BKLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKLN Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
BKLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKLN Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IJH vs. BKLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) and Invesco Senior Loan ETF (BKLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

IJHBKLNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.48
1.61

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.17
2.37

-0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.37

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.61

1.44

+1.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.55

5.65

+3.90

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IJH vs. BKLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJH Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is comparable to the BKLN Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJH and BKLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

IJHBKLNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.48

1.61

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

1.14

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.66

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.64

-0.18

Drawdowns

IJH vs. BKLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJH drawdown since its inception was -55.07%, which is greater than BKLN's maximum drawdown of -24.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJH and BKLN.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IJHBKLNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.07%

-24.17%

-30.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.83%

-3.07%

-5.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.10%

-3.55%

-20.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.10%

-7.31%

-16.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.18%

-24.17%

-18.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.79%

-0.48%

-1.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.57%

-1.09%

-6.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.41%

0.78%

+1.63%

Volatility

IJH vs. BKLN - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) has a higher volatility of 4.17% compared to Invesco Senior Loan ETF (BKLN) at 0.44%. This indicates that IJH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IJHBKLNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.17%

0.44%

+3.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.49%

2.52%

+8.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.64%

2.75%

+12.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.76%

4.48%

+15.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.19%

6.43%

+14.76%

IJH vs. BKLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

IJH has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than BKLN's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

IJH vs. BKLN - Dividend Comparison

IJH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, less than BKLN's 6.63% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BKLN
Invesco Senior Loan ETF		6.63%6.95%8.41%8.59%4.93%3.11%3.56%4.86%4.52%3.50%4.54%4.12%
IJH
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF		1.20%1.36%1.33%1.46%1.68%1.18%1.28%1.63%1.72%1.19%1.60%1.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

IJH and BKLN have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IJH has higher volatility (4.17%) compared to BKLN (0.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJH dropped -55.07% vs BKLN's -24.17%.

On 10-year performance, IJH leads with 11.12% vs 4.25% for BKLN. On fees, IJH is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, BKLN has been the lower-risk option at 0.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IJH has performed better with a 11.12% return vs 4.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IJH is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BKLN.

BKLN has the higher dividend yield at 6.63%, compared with 1.20% for IJH.

IJH is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while BKLN is Bank Loan. IJH tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index, while BKLN tracks Morningstar LSTA US Leveraged Loan 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for IJH and 0.65% for BKLN.

BKLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IJH and BKLN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer