IJH vs. BIZD
IJH (iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF) and BIZD (VanEck BDC Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IJH is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Index, while BIZD is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MVIS US Business Development Companies Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IJH returned 11.12%/yr vs 7.80%/yr for BIZD. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IJH charges 0.05%/yr vs 12.86%/yr for BIZD.
Performance
IJH vs. BIZD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IJH achieves a 12.55% return, which is significantly higher than BIZD's -8.77% return. Over the past 10 years, IJH has outperformed BIZD with an annualized return of 11.12%, while BIZD has yielded a comparatively lower 7.80% annualized return.
IJH
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- YTD
- 12.55%
- 6M
- 12.75%
- 1Y
- 22.98%
- 3Y*
- 15.01%
- 5Y*
- 7.86%
- 10Y*
- 11.12%
BIZD
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- -3.49%
- YTD
- -8.77%
- 6M
- -11.00%
- 1Y
- -13.11%
- 3Y*
- 4.91%
- 5Y*
- 3.86%
- 10Y*
- 7.80%
IJH vs. BIZD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF | 12.55% | 7.42% | 13.92% | 16.40% | -13.11% | 24.72% | 13.60% | 26.10% | -11.19% | 16.26% |
BIZD VanEck BDC Income ETF | -8.77% | -4.96% | 15.63% | 27.02% | -8.51% | 36.25% | -7.12% | 30.87% | -6.88% | 0.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between IJH and BIZD is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2013 | 0.63 |
The correlation between IJH and BIZD shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.64 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IJH vs. BIZD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IJH
BIZD
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Industrials
IJH
BIZD
-
Technology
IJH
BIZD
-
Financial Services
IJH
BIZD
Consumer Cyclical
IJH
BIZD
-
Healthcare
IJH
BIZD
-
Real Estate
IJH
BIZD
-
Energy
IJH
BIZD
-
Basic Materials
IJH
BIZD
-
Consumer Defensive
IJH
BIZD
-
Utilities
IJH
BIZD
-
Communication Services
IJH
BIZD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IJH vs. BIZD — Risk / Return Rank
IJH
BIZD
IJH vs. BIZD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) and VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IJH | BIZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 0.90 | +0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.61 | -0.59 | +3.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.55 | -1.03 | +10.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IJH | BIZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.48 | -0.72 | +2.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 0.22 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.36 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.30 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
IJH vs. BIZD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IJH drawdown since its inception was -55.07%, roughly equal to the maximum BIZD drawdown of -55.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJH and BIZD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IJH | BIZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.07% | -55.44% | +0.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.83% | -22.22% | +13.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.10% | -22.56% | -1.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.10% | -22.91% | -1.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.18% | -55.44% | +13.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.79% | -19.08% | +17.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.57% | -6.73% | -0.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.41% | 12.79% | -10.38% |
Volatility
IJH vs. BIZD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) is 4.17%, while VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD) has a volatility of 5.32%. This indicates that IJH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BIZD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IJH | BIZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.17% | 5.32% | -1.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.49% | 14.92% | -3.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.64% | 18.31% | -2.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.76% | 17.44% | +2.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.19% | 21.76% | -0.57% |
IJH vs. BIZD - Expense Ratio Comparison
IJH has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than BIZD's 12.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
IJH vs. BIZD - Dividend Comparison
IJH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, less than BIZD's 13.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIZD VanEck BDC Income ETF | 13.84% | 11.78% | 10.94% | 10.96% | 11.21% | 8.14% | 10.39% | 9.13% | 10.88% | 9.13% | 8.51% | 9.12% |
IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF | 1.20% | 1.36% | 1.33% | 1.46% | 1.68% | 1.18% | 1.28% | 1.63% | 1.72% | 1.19% | 1.60% | 1.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IJH and BIZD have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BIZD has higher volatility (5.32%) compared to IJH (4.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJH dropped -55.07% vs BIZD's -55.44%.
On 10-year performance, IJH leads with 11.12% vs 7.80% for BIZD. On fees, IJH is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, IJH has been the lower-risk option at 4.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IJH has performed better with a 11.12% return vs 7.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IJH is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 12.86% for BIZD.
BIZD has the higher dividend yield at 13.84%, compared with 1.20% for IJH.
IJH is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while BIZD is Financials Equities. IJH tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index, while BIZD tracks MVIS US Business Development Companies Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for IJH and 12.86% for BIZD.
IJH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs -0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IJH and BIZD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer