IITU.L vs. XSKR.L
IITU.L (iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and XSKR.L (Xtrackers MSCI Europe Communication Services ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - IITU.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index, while XSKR.L is a Communications Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Comm Services NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IITU.L returned 26.86%/yr vs 2.80%/yr for XSKR.L. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IITU.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XSKR.L.
Performance
IITU.L vs. XSKR.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IITU.L achieves a 19.90% return, which is significantly higher than XSKR.L's 3.68% return. Over the past 10 years, IITU.L has outperformed XSKR.L with an annualized return of 26.86%, while XSKR.L has yielded a comparatively lower 2.80% annualized return.
IITU.L
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 6.23%
- YTD
- 19.90%
- 6M
- 16.95%
- 1Y
- 48.26%
- 3Y*
- 30.66%
- 5Y*
- 24.61%
- 10Y*
- 26.86%
XSKR.L
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- 2.21%
- YTD
- 3.68%
- 6M
- 6.07%
- 1Y
- -6.83%
- 3Y*
- 9.88%
- 5Y*
- 5.78%
- 10Y*
- 2.80%
IITU.L vs. XSKR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IITU.L iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 19.90% | 14.44% | 40.85% | 50.70% | -20.63% | 35.67% | 38.34% | 44.21% | 4.28% | 25.57% |
XSKR.L Xtrackers MSCI Europe Communication Services ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C | 3.68% | 9.54% | 11.64% | 14.09% | -6.11% | 7.74% | -7.30% | -1.29% | -8.08% | 4.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between IITU.L and XSKR.L is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2015 | 0.32 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IITU.L and XSKR.L has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.32, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IITU.L vs. XSKR.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IITU.L
XSKR.L
Technology
-
Energy
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
IITU.L
XSKR.L
-
Energy
IITU.L
XSKR.L
-
Industrials
IITU.L
XSKR.L
-
Basic Materials
IITU.L
-
XSKR.L
-
Communication Services
IITU.L
-
XSKR.L
Consumer Cyclical
IITU.L
-
XSKR.L
-
Consumer Defensive
IITU.L
-
XSKR.L
-
Financial Services
IITU.L
-
XSKR.L
-
Healthcare
IITU.L
-
XSKR.L
-
Real Estate
IITU.L
-
XSKR.L
Utilities
IITU.L
-
XSKR.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IITU.L vs. XSKR.L — Risk / Return Rank
IITU.L
XSKR.L
IITU.L vs. XSKR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe Communication Services ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XSKR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IITU.L | XSKR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 0.93 | +0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.87 | -0.51 | +3.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.37 | -1.06 | +8.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IITU.L | XSKR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.42 | -0.50 | +2.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 | 0.43 | +0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.15 | 0.17 | +0.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 0.07 | +0.75 |
Drawdowns
IITU.L vs. XSKR.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IITU.L drawdown since its inception was -41.09%, smaller than the maximum XSKR.L drawdown of -48.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IITU.L and XSKR.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IITU.L | XSKR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.09% | -48.77% | +7.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.76% | -14.35% | -2.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.03% | -14.35% | -13.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.03% | -17.88% | -10.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.03% | -41.65% | +13.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.54% | -8.69% | +3.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.11% | -20.43% | +12.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.53% | 6.98% | -0.45% |
Volatility
IITU.L vs. XSKR.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) has a higher volatility of 7.54% compared to Xtrackers MSCI Europe Communication Services ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XSKR.L) at 4.99%. This indicates that IITU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XSKR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IITU.L | XSKR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.54% | 4.99% | +2.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.68% | 12.18% | +2.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.85% | 14.67% | +5.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.13% | 13.62% | +12.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.64% | 16.77% | +6.87% |
IITU.L vs. XSKR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IITU.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XSKR.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IITU.L vs. XSKR.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IITU.L nor XSKR.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IITU.L and XSKR.L have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IITU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IITU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XSKR.L.
IITU.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while XSKR.L is Communications Equities. IITU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index, while XSKR.L tracks MSCI World/Comm Services NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IITU.L and 0.20% for XSKR.L.
Find the right allocation for IITU.L and XSKR.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer