PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGLN.L vs. VAGS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IGLN.L vs. VAGS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L) and Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating (VAGS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IGLN.L is traded in USD, while VAGS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VAGS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGLN.L achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly higher than VAGS.L's -1.04% return.


IGLN.L

1D
-0.32%
1M
-8.04%
YTD
0.50%
6M
3.23%
1Y
29.84%
3Y*
30.05%
5Y*
17.89%
10Y*
12.87%

VAGS.L

1D
0.09%
1M
-2.47%
YTD
-1.04%
6M
0.70%
1Y
1.69%
3Y*
7.91%
5Y*
0.26%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGLN.L vs. VAGS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IGLN.L
iShares Physical Gold ETC
0.50%64.93%26.14%13.44%-0.09%-4.03%24.16%13.39%
VAGS.L
Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating
-1.04%14.62%3.81%14.28%-21.87%-2.20%9.97%7.62%

Correlation

The correlation between IGLN.L and VAGS.L is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2019

0.38

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGLN.L vs. VAGS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGLN.L
IGLN.L Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
IGLN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGLN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGLN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
IGLN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGLN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

VAGS.L
VAGS.L Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
VAGS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VAGS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
VAGS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
VAGS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
VAGS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGLN.L vs. VAGS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L) and Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating (VAGS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IGLN.LVAGS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.04

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

0.31

+1.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.30

0.73

+3.57

IGLN.L vs. VAGS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGLN.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is higher than the VAGS.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGLN.L and VAGS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IGLN.LVAGS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.19

0.20

+0.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.03

0.02

+1.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.26

+0.18

Drawdowns

IGLN.L vs. VAGS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGLN.L drawdown since its inception was -45.25%, which is greater than VAGS.L's maximum drawdown of -34.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGLN.L and VAGS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGLN.LVAGS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.25%

-34.86%

-10.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.26%

-5.44%

-12.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.26%

-10.83%

-7.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.15%

-34.86%

+13.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.26%

-3.80%

-14.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.72%

-9.11%

-10.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.93%

2.30%

+4.63%

Volatility

IGLN.L vs. VAGS.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L) has a higher volatility of 6.10% compared to Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating (VAGS.L) at 2.80%. This indicates that IGLN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VAGS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGLN.LVAGS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.10%

2.80%

+3.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.87%

6.14%

+15.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.98%

8.45%

+16.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.41%

10.90%

+6.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.56%

10.90%

+4.66%

IGLN.L vs. VAGS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGLN.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than VAGS.L's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IGLN.L vs. VAGS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IGLN.L nor VAGS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
IGLN.L
iShares Physical Gold ETC
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VAGS.L
Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating
0.00%1.43%3.03%2.33%1.45%0.87%1.08%0.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


IGLN.L and VAGS.L have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VAGS.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VAGS.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for IGLN.L.

IGLN.L is categorized as Gold, while VAGS.L is Global Bonds. IGLN.L tracks LBMA Gold Price, while VAGS.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for IGLN.L and 0.10% for VAGS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGLN.L and VAGS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer