PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IGLN.L vs. PLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IGLN.L vs. PLD

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

IGLN.L (iShares Physical Gold ETC) is Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price, while PLD (Prologis, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, IGLN.L returned 12.87%/yr vs 14.19%/yr for PLD. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

IGLN.L vs. PLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L) and Prologis, Inc. (PLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGLN.L achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly lower than PLD's 12.74% return. Over the past 10 years, IGLN.L has underperformed PLD with an annualized return of 12.87%, while PLD has yielded a comparatively higher 14.19% annualized return.

IGLN.L

1D
-0.32%
1M
-8.04%
YTD
0.50%
6M
3.23%
1Y
29.84%
3Y*
30.05%
5Y*
17.89%
10Y*
12.87%

PLD

1D
-1.22%
1M
-0.91%
YTD
12.74%
6M
14.51%
1Y
35.80%
3Y*
9.00%
5Y*
5.89%
10Y*
14.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGLN.L vs. PLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IGLN.L
iShares Physical Gold ETC		0.50%64.93%26.14%13.44%-0.09%-4.03%24.16%18.30%-1.33%11.69%
PLD
Prologis, Inc.		12.74%25.08%-18.12%21.58%-31.33%72.33%14.74%55.87%-6.25%25.94%

Correlation

The correlation between IGLN.L and PLD is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2011

0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Physical Gold ETC

Prologis, Inc.

Often compared with IGLN.L:
IGLN.L vs. SGLN.LIGLN.L vs. GLDIGLN.L vs. XAUUSD=XIGLN.L vs. GBSP.LIGLN.L vs. XSFN.LIGLN.L vs. EGLN.LIGLN.L vs. SPY
Often compared with PLD:
PLD vs. VNQPLD vs. STAGPLD vs. PSAPLD vs. VOOPLD vs. EXRPLD vs. CUBEPLD vs. ILPT

Return for Risk

IGLN.L vs. PLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IGLN.L
IGLN.L Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
IGLN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGLN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGLN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
IGLN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGLN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
PLD
PLD Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
PLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLD Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
PLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGLN.L vs. PLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L) and Prologis, Inc. (PLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

IGLN.LPLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.19
1.70

-0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.61
2.47

-0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.30

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

3.75

-2.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.30

12.35

-8.05

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IGLN.L vs. PLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGLN.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is comparable to the PLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGLN.L and PLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

IGLN.LPLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.19

1.70

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.03

0.22

+0.81

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

0.53

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.33

+0.11

Drawdowns

IGLN.L vs. PLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGLN.L drawdown since its inception was -45.25%, smaller than the maximum PLD drawdown of -84.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGLN.L and PLD.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IGLN.LPLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.25%

-84.70%

+39.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.26%

-9.59%

-8.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.26%

-31.37%

+13.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.15%

-43.30%

+22.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.15%

-43.30%

+22.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.26%

-6.67%

-11.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.72%

-17.36%

-2.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.93%

2.91%

+4.02%

Volatility

IGLN.L vs. PLD - Volatility Comparison

iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L) has a higher volatility of 6.10% compared to Prologis, Inc. (PLD) at 5.54%. This indicates that IGLN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IGLN.LPLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.10%

5.54%

+0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.87%

14.18%

+7.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.98%

21.22%

+3.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.41%

26.95%

-9.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.56%

26.98%

-11.42%

Dividends

IGLN.L vs. PLD - Dividend Comparison

IGLN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IGLN.L
iShares Physical Gold ETC		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PLD
Prologis, Inc.		2.87%3.16%3.63%2.61%2.80%1.50%2.33%2.38%3.27%2.73%3.18%3.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

IGLN.L and PLD have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGLN.L and PLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer