IGLN.L vs. IBIT
IGLN.L (iShares Physical Gold ETC) and IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IGLN.L is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price, while IBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IGLN.L returned 29.84% vs -39.44% for IBIT. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IGLN.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IBIT.
Performance
IGLN.L vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGLN.L achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -27.71% return.
IGLN.L
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- -8.04%
- YTD
- 0.50%
- 6M
- 3.23%
- 1Y
- 29.84%
- 3Y*
- 30.05%
- 5Y*
- 17.89%
- 10Y*
- 12.87%
IBIT
- 1D
- 5.13%
- 1M
- -21.03%
- YTD
- -27.71%
- 6M
- -30.34%
- 1Y
- -39.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IGLN.L vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
IGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | 0.50% | 64.93% | 28.73% |
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | -27.71% | -6.41% | 89.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGLN.L and IBIT is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGLN.L vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank
IGLN.L
IBIT
IGLN.L vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IGLN.L | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 0.86 | +0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.63 | -0.76 | +2.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.30 | -1.36 | +5.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IGLN.L | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.19 | -0.90 | +2.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.26 | +0.17 |
Drawdowns
IGLN.L vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGLN.L drawdown since its inception was -45.25%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -52.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGLN.L and IBIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGLN.L | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.25% | -52.11% | +6.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.26% | -52.11% | +33.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.26% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.15% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.15% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.26% | -49.66% | +31.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.72% | -16.19% | -3.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.93% | 28.97% | -22.04% |
Volatility
IGLN.L vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L) is 6.10%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 11.85%. This indicates that IGLN.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGLN.L | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.10% | 11.85% | -5.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.87% | 34.60% | -12.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.98% | 44.28% | -19.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.41% | 50.32% | -32.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.56% | 50.32% | -34.76% |
IGLN.L vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGLN.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IGLN.L vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison
Neither IGLN.L nor IBIT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IGLN.L and IBIT have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IGLN.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IGLN.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IBIT.
IGLN.L is categorized as Gold, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. IGLN.L tracks LBMA Gold Price, while IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for IGLN.L and 0.25% for IBIT.
Find the right allocation for IGLN.L and IBIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer