PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGLD vs. GPIQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IGLD vs. GPIQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGLD achieves a -0.64% return, which is significantly lower than GPIQ's 14.88% return.


IGLD

1D
0.22%
1M
-7.38%
YTD
-0.64%
6M
2.24%
1Y
23.15%
3Y*
21.74%
5Y*
12.52%
10Y*

GPIQ

1D
1.46%
1M
0.97%
YTD
14.88%
6M
14.06%
1Y
33.04%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGLD vs. GPIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
IGLD
FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF
-0.64%47.46%19.36%4.13%
GPIQ
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF
14.88%19.77%23.22%15.38%

Correlation

The correlation between IGLD and GPIQ is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2023

0.12

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGLD vs. GPIQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGLD
IGLD Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
IGLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGLD Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
IGLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGLD Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

GPIQ
GPIQ Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
GPIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
GPIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGLD vs. GPIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IGLDGPIQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.43

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.32

3.49

-2.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.48

15.21

-11.73

IGLD vs. GPIQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGLD Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is lower than the GPIQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGLD and GPIQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IGLDGPIQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

2.36

-1.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

1.67

-0.78

Drawdowns

IGLD vs. GPIQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGLD drawdown since its inception was -18.59%, smaller than the maximum GPIQ drawdown of -21.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGLD and GPIQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGLDGPIQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.59%

-21.06%

+2.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.56%

-9.51%

-8.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.10%

-3.08%

-14.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.27%

-2.27%

-3.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.67%

2.18%

+4.49%

Volatility

IGLD vs. GPIQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD) is 5.18%, while Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) has a volatility of 5.54%. This indicates that IGLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GPIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGLDGPIQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.18%

5.54%

-0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.28%

11.32%

+9.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.50%

14.07%

+9.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.24%

17.63%

-2.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.06%

17.63%

-2.57%

IGLD vs. GPIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGLD has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than GPIQ's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

IGLD vs. GPIQ - Dividend Comparison

IGLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.34%, more than GPIQ's 9.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
GPIQ
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF
9.60%9.81%9.18%1.74%0.00%0.00%
IGLD
FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF
18.34%9.91%20.81%7.85%4.45%2.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


IGLD and GPIQ have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GPIQ has higher volatility (5.54%) compared to IGLD (5.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGLD dropped -18.59% vs GPIQ's -21.06%.

On 1-year performance, GPIQ leads with 33.04% vs 23.15% for IGLD. On fees, GPIQ is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, IGLD has been the lower-risk option at 5.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GPIQ has performed better with a 33.04% return vs 23.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GPIQ is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for IGLD.

IGLD has the higher dividend yield at 18.34%, compared with 9.60% for GPIQ.

IGLD is categorized as Gold, while GPIQ is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for IGLD and 0.29% for GPIQ.

GPIQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGLD and GPIQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer