IGF vs. VHYL.AS
IGF (iShares Global Infrastructure ETF) and VHYL.AS (Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF - (USD) Distributing) are both exchange-traded funds - IGF is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Infrastructure Index, while VHYL.AS is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IGF returned 8.26%/yr vs 9.97%/yr for VHYL.AS. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IGF charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for VHYL.AS.
Performance
IGF vs. VHYL.AS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IGF is traded in USD, while VHYL.AS is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the VHYL.AS values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGF achieves a 7.07% return, which is significantly lower than VHYL.AS's 10.14% return. Over the past 10 years, IGF has underperformed VHYL.AS with an annualized return of 8.26%, while VHYL.AS has yielded a comparatively higher 9.97% annualized return.
IGF
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- -1.91%
- YTD
- 7.07%
- 6M
- 8.23%
- 1Y
- 13.89%
- 3Y*
- 15.43%
- 5Y*
- 9.75%
- 10Y*
- 8.26%
VHYL.AS
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- YTD
- 10.14%
- 6M
- 12.79%
- 1Y
- 25.46%
- 3Y*
- 18.17%
- 5Y*
- 10.23%
- 10Y*
- 9.97%
IGF vs. VHYL.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF | 7.07% | 21.31% | 14.81% | 6.14% | -1.26% | 11.57% | -6.50% | 25.82% | -9.95% | 19.31% |
VHYL.AS Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF - (USD) Distributing | 10.14% | 27.49% | 9.55% | 10.41% | -5.85% | 19.14% | -0.72% | 20.52% | -11.34% | 19.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGF and VHYL.AS is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2013 | 0.59 |
The correlation between IGF and VHYL.AS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGF vs. VHYL.AS — Risk / Return Rank
IGF
VHYL.AS
IGF vs. VHYL.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) and Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF - (USD) Distributing (VHYL.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IGF | VHYL.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.44 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.38 | 3.22 | -0.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.08 | 11.55 | -4.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IGF | VHYL.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.32 | 2.41 | -1.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 0.75 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.67 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.37 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
IGF vs. VHYL.AS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGF drawdown since its inception was -58.33%, which is greater than VHYL.AS's maximum drawdown of -36.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGF and VHYL.AS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGF | VHYL.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.33% | -36.02% | -22.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.87% | -7.74% | +1.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.28% | -13.58% | -0.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.83% | -20.99% | +0.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.11% | -36.02% | -6.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.29% | -1.60% | -3.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.87% | -8.88% | -2.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 2.17% | -0.20% |
Volatility
IGF vs. VHYL.AS - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) has a higher volatility of 3.61% compared to Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF - (USD) Distributing (VHYL.AS) at 2.54%. This indicates that IGF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VHYL.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGF | VHYL.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.61% | 2.54% | +1.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.68% | 8.20% | +0.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.56% | 10.34% | +0.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.00% | 13.39% | +0.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.84% | 14.66% | +2.18% |
IGF vs. VHYL.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGF has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than VHYL.AS's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
IGF vs. VHYL.AS - Dividend Comparison
IGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, more than VHYL.AS's 2.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF | 3.01% | 3.23% | 3.21% | 3.36% | 2.67% | 2.42% | 2.33% | 3.27% | 3.52% | 2.95% | 2.98% | 3.25% |
VHYL.AS Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF - (USD) Distributing | 2.50% | 2.85% | 3.04% | 3.41% | 3.78% | 3.03% | 3.08% | 3.24% | 3.68% | 3.13% | 3.02% | 3.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGF and VHYL.AS have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VHYL.AS is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VHYL.AS is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for IGF.
IGF is categorized as Industrials Equities, while VHYL.AS is Global Equities. IGF tracks S&P Global Infrastructure Index, while VHYL.AS tracks FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IGF and 0.29% for VHYL.AS.
Find the right allocation for IGF and VHYL.AS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer