IGF vs. VFV.TO
IGF (iShares Global Infrastructure ETF) and VFV.TO (Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IGF is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Infrastructure Index, while VFV.TO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IGF returned 8.26%/yr vs 14.98%/yr for VFV.TO. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IGF charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VFV.TO.
Performance
IGF vs. VFV.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IGF is traded in USD, while VFV.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the VFV.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGF achieves a 7.07% return, which is significantly lower than VFV.TO's 8.51% return. Over the past 10 years, IGF has underperformed VFV.TO with an annualized return of 8.26%, while VFV.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 14.98% annualized return.
IGF
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- -1.91%
- YTD
- 7.07%
- 6M
- 8.23%
- 1Y
- 13.89%
- 3Y*
- 15.43%
- 5Y*
- 9.75%
- 10Y*
- 8.26%
VFV.TO
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- 8.51%
- 6M
- 8.63%
- 1Y
- 24.44%
- 3Y*
- 21.24%
- 5Y*
- 13.20%
- 10Y*
- 14.98%
IGF vs. VFV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF | 7.07% | 21.31% | 14.81% | 6.14% | -1.26% | 11.57% | -6.50% | 25.82% | -9.95% | 19.31% |
VFV.TO Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF | 8.45% | 17.55% | 24.68% | 26.24% | -17.79% | 27.57% | 18.42% | 30.52% | -5.03% | 21.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGF and VFV.TO is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2012 | 0.40 |
The correlation between IGF and VFV.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.40 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IGF vs. VFV.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IGF
VFV.TO
Utilities
Industrials
Energy
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Technology
-
Utilities
IGF
VFV.TO
Industrials
IGF
VFV.TO
Energy
IGF
VFV.TO
Real Estate
IGF
VFV.TO
Basic Materials
IGF
-
VFV.TO
Communication Services
IGF
-
VFV.TO
Consumer Cyclical
IGF
-
VFV.TO
Consumer Defensive
IGF
-
VFV.TO
Financial Services
IGF
-
VFV.TO
Healthcare
IGF
-
VFV.TO
Technology
IGF
-
VFV.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGF vs. VFV.TO — Risk / Return Rank
IGF
VFV.TO
IGF vs. VFV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) and Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IGF | VFV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.36 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.38 | 2.71 | -0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.08 | 12.01 | -4.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IGF | VFV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.32 | 1.95 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 0.83 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.85 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.87 | -0.64 |
Drawdowns
IGF vs. VFV.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGF drawdown since its inception was -58.33%, which is greater than VFV.TO's maximum drawdown of -33.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGF and VFV.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGF | VFV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.33% | -33.56% | -24.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.87% | -9.04% | +3.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.28% | -18.94% | +4.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.83% | -24.33% | +3.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.11% | -33.56% | -8.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.29% | -2.69% | -2.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.87% | -3.86% | -8.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 2.04% | -0.07% |
Volatility
IGF vs. VFV.TO - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) and Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO) have volatilities of 3.61% and 3.80%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGF | VFV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.61% | 3.80% | -0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.68% | 9.46% | -0.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.56% | 12.59% | -2.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.00% | 16.07% | -2.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.84% | 17.73% | -0.89% |
IGF vs. VFV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGF has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than VFV.TO's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
IGF vs. VFV.TO - Dividend Comparison
IGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, more than VFV.TO's 0.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF | 3.01% | 3.23% | 3.21% | 3.36% | 2.67% | 2.42% | 2.33% | 3.27% | 3.52% | 2.95% | 2.98% | 3.25% |
VFV.TO Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF | 0.85% | 0.92% | 0.99% | 1.20% | 1.31% | 1.06% | 1.33% | 1.55% | 1.69% | 1.51% | 1.65% | 1.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGF and VFV.TO have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VFV.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VFV.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for IGF.
IGF is categorized as Industrials Equities, while VFV.TO is S&P 500. IGF tracks S&P Global Infrastructure Index, while VFV.TO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IGF and 0.09% for VFV.TO.
Find the right allocation for IGF and VFV.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer