IGF vs. SCHY
IGF (iShares Global Infrastructure ETF) and SCHY (Schwab International Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IGF is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Infrastructure Index, while SCHY is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones International Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IGF returned 9.75%/yr vs 7.76%/yr for SCHY. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IGF charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for SCHY.
Performance
IGF vs. SCHY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGF achieves a 7.07% return, which is significantly lower than SCHY's 7.47% return.
IGF
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- -1.91%
- YTD
- 7.07%
- 6M
- 8.23%
- 1Y
- 13.89%
- 3Y*
- 15.43%
- 5Y*
- 9.75%
- 10Y*
- 8.26%
SCHY
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -0.99%
- YTD
- 7.47%
- 6M
- 10.12%
- 1Y
- 21.14%
- 3Y*
- 14.84%
- 5Y*
- 7.76%
- 10Y*
- —
IGF vs. SCHY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF | 7.07% | 21.31% | 14.81% | 6.14% | -1.26% | 4.97% |
SCHY Schwab International Dividend Equity ETF | 7.47% | 33.98% | -1.79% | 14.27% | -9.43% | 3.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGF and SCHY is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2021 | 0.76 |
The correlation between IGF and SCHY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
IGF vs. SCHY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IGF
SCHY
Utilities
Industrials
Energy
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Technology
-
Utilities
IGF
SCHY
Industrials
IGF
SCHY
Energy
IGF
SCHY
Real Estate
IGF
SCHY
Basic Materials
IGF
-
SCHY
Communication Services
IGF
-
SCHY
Consumer Cyclical
IGF
-
SCHY
Consumer Defensive
IGF
-
SCHY
Financial Services
IGF
-
SCHY
Healthcare
IGF
-
SCHY
Technology
IGF
-
SCHY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGF vs. SCHY — Risk / Return Rank
IGF
SCHY
IGF vs. SCHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) and Schwab International Dividend Equity ETF (SCHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IGF | SCHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.31 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.38 | 2.33 | +0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.08 | 7.31 | -0.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IGF | SCHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.32 | 1.78 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 0.59 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.65 | -0.42 |
Drawdowns
IGF vs. SCHY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGF drawdown since its inception was -58.33%, which is greater than SCHY's maximum drawdown of -24.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGF and SCHY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGF | SCHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.33% | -24.04% | -34.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.87% | -9.11% | +3.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.28% | -12.16% | -2.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.83% | -24.04% | +3.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.29% | -5.55% | +0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.87% | -4.97% | -6.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 2.90% | -0.93% |
Volatility
IGF vs. SCHY - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) has a higher volatility of 3.61% compared to Schwab International Dividend Equity ETF (SCHY) at 2.83%. This indicates that IGF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGF | SCHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.61% | 2.83% | +0.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.68% | 9.86% | -1.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.56% | 11.96% | -1.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.00% | 13.26% | +0.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.84% | 13.23% | +3.61% |
IGF vs. SCHY - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGF has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHY's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
IGF vs. SCHY - Dividend Comparison
IGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, less than SCHY's 3.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF | 3.01% | 3.23% | 3.21% | 3.36% | 2.67% | 2.42% | 2.33% | 3.27% | 3.52% | 2.95% | 2.98% | 3.25% |
SCHY Schwab International Dividend Equity ETF | 3.45% | 3.55% | 4.64% | 3.97% | 3.67% | 1.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGF and SCHY have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IGF has higher volatility (3.61%) compared to SCHY (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGF dropped -58.33% vs SCHY's -24.04%.
On 5-year performance, IGF leads with 9.75% vs 7.76% for SCHY. On fees, SCHY is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, SCHY has been the lower-risk option at 2.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IGF has performed better with a 9.75% return vs 7.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHY is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for IGF.
SCHY has the higher dividend yield at 3.45%, compared with 3.01% for IGF.
IGF is categorized as Industrials Equities, while SCHY is Dividend. IGF tracks S&P Global Infrastructure Index, while SCHY tracks Dow Jones International Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IGF and 0.08% for SCHY.
SCHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IGF and SCHY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer