IGF vs. GLTL.L
IGF (iShares Global Infrastructure ETF) and GLTL.L (SPDR Bloomberg 15+ Year Gilt UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IGF is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Infrastructure Index, while GLTL.L is a European Government Bonds fund tracking the FTSE Act UK Cnvt Gilts All Stocks TR GBP. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IGF returned 8.26%/yr vs -4.40%/yr for GLTL.L. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IGF charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for GLTL.L.
Performance
IGF vs. GLTL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IGF is traded in USD, while GLTL.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the GLTL.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGF achieves a 7.07% return, which is significantly higher than GLTL.L's -4.93% return. Over the past 10 years, IGF has outperformed GLTL.L with an annualized return of 8.26%, while GLTL.L has yielded a comparatively lower -4.40% annualized return.
IGF
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- -1.91%
- YTD
- 7.07%
- 6M
- 8.23%
- 1Y
- 13.89%
- 3Y*
- 15.43%
- 5Y*
- 9.75%
- 10Y*
- 8.26%
GLTL.L
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -2.37%
- YTD
- -4.93%
- 6M
- -3.41%
- 1Y
- -1.54%
- 3Y*
- 0.73%
- 5Y*
- -12.18%
- 10Y*
- -4.40%
IGF vs. GLTL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF | 7.07% | 21.31% | 14.81% | 6.14% | -1.26% | 11.57% | -6.50% | 25.82% | -9.95% | 19.31% |
GLTL.L SPDR Bloomberg 15+ Year Gilt UCITS ETF | -4.93% | 10.93% | -11.96% | 6.60% | -47.01% | -7.42% | 17.09% | 16.02% | -5.45% | 13.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGF and GLTL.L is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2012 | 0.19 |
Over the past year, IGF and GLTL.L have become more correlated (0.45) than their long-term average of 0.19, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGF vs. GLTL.L — Risk / Return Rank
IGF
GLTL.L
IGF vs. GLTL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) and SPDR Bloomberg 15+ Year Gilt UCITS ETF (GLTL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IGF | GLTL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.00 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.38 | -0.13 | +2.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.08 | -0.30 | +7.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IGF | GLTL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.32 | -0.10 | +1.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | -0.54 | +1.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | -0.23 | +0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | -0.09 | +0.33 |
Drawdowns
IGF vs. GLTL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGF drawdown since its inception was -58.33%, smaller than the maximum GLTL.L drawdown of -63.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGF and GLTL.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGF | GLTL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.33% | -63.35% | +5.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.87% | -11.93% | +6.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.28% | -20.98% | +6.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.83% | -62.68% | +41.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.11% | -63.35% | +21.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.29% | -51.54% | +46.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.87% | -19.31% | +7.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 5.08% | -3.11% |
Volatility
IGF vs. GLTL.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) is 3.61%, while SPDR Bloomberg 15+ Year Gilt UCITS ETF (GLTL.L) has a volatility of 5.96%. This indicates that IGF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLTL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGF | GLTL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.61% | 5.96% | -2.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.68% | 11.74% | -3.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.56% | 15.79% | -5.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.00% | 22.62% | -8.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.84% | 19.38% | -2.54% |
IGF vs. GLTL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGF has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than GLTL.L's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
IGF vs. GLTL.L - Dividend Comparison
IGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, less than GLTL.L's 5.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLTL.L SPDR Bloomberg 15+ Year Gilt UCITS ETF | 5.15% | 4.77% | 4.39% | 2.97% | 1.63% | 0.87% | 1.01% | 1.43% | 1.55% | 1.86% | 1.99% | 2.51% |
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF | 3.01% | 3.23% | 3.21% | 3.36% | 2.67% | 2.42% | 2.33% | 3.27% | 3.52% | 2.95% | 2.98% | 3.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGF and GLTL.L have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GLTL.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GLTL.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for IGF.
IGF is categorized as Industrials Equities, while GLTL.L is European Government Bonds. IGF tracks S&P Global Infrastructure Index, while GLTL.L tracks FTSE Act UK Cnvt Gilts All Stocks TR GBP. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IGF and 0.15% for GLTL.L.
Find the right allocation for IGF and GLTL.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer