IGF vs. EQGB.L

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

IGF (iShares Global Infrastructure ETF) and EQGB.L (Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - IGF is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Infrastructure Index, while EQGB.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IGF returned 9.75%/yr vs 14.26%/yr for EQGB.L. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IGF charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for EQGB.L.

Performance

IGF vs. EQGB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) and Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc (EQGB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

IGF is traded in USD, while EQGB.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the EQGB.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGF achieves a 7.07% return, which is significantly lower than EQGB.L's 14.54% return.

IGF

• 1D: -0.73%
• 1M: -1.91%
• YTD: 7.07%
• 6M: 8.23%
• 1Y: 13.89%
• 3Y*: 15.43%
• 5Y*: 9.75%
• 10Y*: 8.26%

EQGB.L

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: -0.59%
• YTD: 14.54%
• 6M: 14.93%
• 1Y: 33.11%
• 3Y*: 28.86%
• 5Y*: 14.26%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGF vs. EQGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF	7.07%	21.31%	14.81%	6.14%	-1.26%	11.57%	-6.50%	25.82%	-9.95%	0.29%
EQGB.L Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc	14.54%	28.61%	24.02%	62.04%	-42.01%	26.53%	49.89%	47.53%	-7.95%	7.72%

Correlation

The correlation between IGF and EQGB.L is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.26
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.23
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2017	0.37

The correlation between IGF and EQGB.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (3 years) to 0.36 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IGF vs. EQGB.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IGF	EQGB.L
Utilities	41.1%	1.4%
Industrials	38.8%	3.1%
Energy	20.1%	0.6%
Real Estate	0.1%	0.1%
Basic Materials	-	1.1%
Communication Services	-	15.8%
Consumer Cyclical	-	12.2%
Consumer Defensive	-	7.7%
Financial Services	-	0.2%
Healthcare	-	4.2%
Technology	-	53.6%

Return for Risk

IGF vs. EQGB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGF

IGF Risk / Return Rank: 45
IGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
IGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
IGF Omega Ratio Rank: 40
IGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
IGF Martin Ratio Rank: 47

EQGB.L

EQGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 71
EQGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
EQGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
EQGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 70
EQGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
EQGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGF vs. EQGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) and Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc (EQGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IGF	EQGB.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.32	1.77	-0.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.91	2.54	-0.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.30	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.38	2.20	+0.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.08	8.15	-1.07
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IGF vs. EQGB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGF Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is comparable to the EQGB.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGF and EQGB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IGF	EQGB.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.32	1.77	-0.45
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70	0.58	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.23	0.80	-0.56

Drawdowns

IGF vs. EQGB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGF drawdown since its inception was -58.33%, which is greater than EQGB.L's maximum drawdown of -47.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGF and EQGB.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	IGF	EQGB.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.33%	-47.56%	-10.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.87%	-14.96%	+9.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.28%	-22.21%	+7.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.83%	-47.56%	+26.73%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.11%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.29%	-4.48%	-0.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.87%	-9.51%	-2.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.97%	4.05%	-2.08%

Volatility

IGF vs. EQGB.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) is 3.61%, while Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc (EQGB.L) has a volatility of 6.24%. This indicates that IGF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EQGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IGF	EQGB.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.61%	6.24%	-2.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.68%	14.28%	-5.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.56%	18.66%	-8.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.00%	24.79%	-10.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.84%	24.75%	-7.91%

IGF vs. EQGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGF has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than EQGB.L's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

IGF vs. EQGB.L - Dividend Comparison

IGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, while EQGB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EQGB.L Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	4.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF	3.01%	3.23%	3.21%	3.36%	2.67%	2.42%	2.33%	3.27%	3.52%	2.95%	2.98%	3.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IGF and EQGB.L in my portfolio?

IGF and EQGB.L have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IGF or EQGB.L?

On fees, EQGB.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IGF or EQGB.L?

EQGB.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for IGF.

What is the main difference between IGF and EQGB.L?

IGF is categorized as Industrials Equities, while EQGB.L is Nasdaq-100. IGF tracks S&P Global Infrastructure Index, while EQGB.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IGF and 0.35% for EQGB.L.