IEMG vs. CRM

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

IEMG (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF) is Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net), while CRM (Salesforce, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, IEMG returned 9.88%/yr vs 8.51%/yr for CRM. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

IEMG vs. CRM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) and Salesforce, Inc. (CRM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEMG achieves a 18.97% return, which is significantly higher than CRM's -30.92% return. Over the past 10 years, IEMG has outperformed CRM with an annualized return of 9.88%, while CRM has yielded a comparatively lower 8.51% annualized return.

IEMG

• 1D: 1.70%
• 1M: -3.66%
• YTD: 18.97%
• 6M: 20.80%
• 1Y: 40.80%
• 3Y*: 20.51%
• 5Y*: 6.57%
• 10Y*: 9.88%

CRM

• 1D: -1.68%
• 1M: 0.40%
• YTD: -30.92%
• 6M: -29.37%
• 1Y: -33.00%
• 3Y*: -4.89%
• 5Y*: -4.74%
• 10Y*: 8.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEMG vs. CRM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF	18.97%	32.56%	6.50%	11.52%	-19.98%	-0.64%	17.87%	17.81%	-14.92%	37.38%
CRM Salesforce, Inc.	-30.92%	-20.25%	27.76%	98.46%	-47.83%	14.20%	36.82%	18.74%	33.98%	49.33%

Correlation

The correlation between IEMG and CRM is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.14
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.27
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2012	0.42

Over the past year, the correlation between IEMG and CRM has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

IEMG vs. CRM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEMG

IEMG Risk / Return Rank: 67
IEMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
IEMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
IEMG Omega Ratio Rank: 71
IEMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
IEMG Martin Ratio Rank: 69

CRM

CRM Risk / Return Rank: 8
CRM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
CRM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
CRM Omega Ratio Rank: 10
CRM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
CRM Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEMG vs. CRM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) and Salesforce, Inc. (CRM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IEMG	CRM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.99	-0.88	+2.87
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.58	-1.17	+3.75
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	0.86	+0.52
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.10	-0.84	+3.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.68	-1.62	+13.30
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IEMG vs. CRM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEMG Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is higher than the CRM Sharpe Ratio of -0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEMG and CRM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IEMG	CRM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.99	-0.88	+2.87
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.35	-0.13	+0.48
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49	0.24	+0.25
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.33	0.45	-0.12

Drawdowns

IEMG vs. CRM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEMG drawdown since its inception was -38.71%, smaller than the maximum CRM drawdown of -70.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEMG and CRM.

Drawdown Indicators

	IEMG	CRM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.71%	-70.50%	+31.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.21%	-39.36%	+26.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.21%	-54.70%	+37.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.75%	-58.62%	+22.87%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.71%	-58.62%	+19.91%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.00%	-49.87%	+42.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.97%	-16.12%	+3.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.50%	20.48%	-16.98%

Volatility

IEMG vs. CRM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) is 10.33%, while Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) has a volatility of 16.96%. This indicates that IEMG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IEMG	CRM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.33%	16.96%	-6.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.35%	31.74%	-13.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.62%	37.87%	-17.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.62%	37.02%	-18.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.14%	35.36%	-15.22%

Dividends

IEMG vs. CRM - Dividend Comparison

IEMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, more than CRM's 0.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CRM Salesforce, Inc.	0.92%	0.63%	0.48%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF	2.31%	2.75%	3.20%	2.89%	2.71%	3.06%	1.87%	3.15%	2.76%	2.35%	2.28%	2.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IEMG and CRM in my portfolio?

IEMG and CRM have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IEMG or CRM?

CRM has higher volatility (16.96%) compared to IEMG (10.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IEMG dropped -38.71% vs CRM's -70.50%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IEMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs -0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.