PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IEMG vs. ADP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IEMG vs. ADP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) and Automatic Data Processing, Inc. (ADP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEMG achieves a 18.97% return, which is significantly higher than ADP's -10.21% return. Over the past 10 years, IEMG has underperformed ADP with an annualized return of 9.88%, while ADP has yielded a comparatively higher 12.50% annualized return.


IEMG

1D
1.70%
1M
-3.66%
YTD
18.97%
6M
20.80%
1Y
40.80%
3Y*
20.51%
5Y*
6.57%
10Y*
9.88%

ADP

1D
-1.24%
1M
7.55%
YTD
-10.21%
6M
-10.14%
1Y
-28.14%
3Y*
4.26%
5Y*
5.16%
10Y*
12.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEMG vs. ADP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
18.97%32.56%6.50%11.52%-19.98%-0.64%17.87%17.81%-14.92%37.38%
ADP
Automatic Data Processing, Inc.
-10.21%-10.18%28.41%-0.25%-1.29%42.60%5.86%32.71%14.25%16.54%

Correlation

The correlation between IEMG and ADP is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2012

0.38

The correlation between IEMG and ADP shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.38 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IEMG vs. ADP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEMG
IEMG Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
IEMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEMG Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
IEMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEMG Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

ADP
ADP Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
ADP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADP Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADP Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
ADP Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADP Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEMG vs. ADP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) and Automatic Data Processing, Inc. (ADP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IEMGADPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

0.80

+0.58

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

-0.72

+3.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.68

-1.33

+13.01

IEMG vs. ADP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEMG Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is higher than the ADP Sharpe Ratio of -1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEMG and ADP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IEMGADPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99

-1.16

+3.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.24

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.51

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.54

-0.21

Drawdowns

IEMG vs. ADP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEMG drawdown since its inception was -38.71%, smaller than the maximum ADP drawdown of -59.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEMG and ADP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IEMGADPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.71%

-59.51%

+20.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.21%

-39.25%

+26.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.21%

-40.78%

+23.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.75%

-40.78%

+5.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.71%

-40.78%

+2.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.00%

-28.14%

+21.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.97%

-12.59%

-0.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.50%

22.88%

-19.38%

Volatility

IEMG vs. ADP - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) has a higher volatility of 10.33% compared to Automatic Data Processing, Inc. (ADP) at 9.30%. This indicates that IEMG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ADP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IEMGADPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.33%

9.30%

+1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.35%

20.42%

-2.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.62%

24.35%

-3.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.62%

22.05%

-3.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.14%

24.48%

-4.34%

Dividends

IEMG vs. ADP - Dividend Comparison

IEMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, less than ADP's 2.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ADP
Automatic Data Processing, Inc.
2.83%2.46%1.96%2.21%1.83%1.55%2.08%1.92%2.14%2.00%2.10%2.36%
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
2.31%2.75%3.20%2.89%2.71%3.06%1.87%3.15%2.76%2.35%2.28%2.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


IEMG and ADP have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IEMG has higher volatility (10.33%) compared to ADP (9.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IEMG dropped -38.71% vs ADP's -59.51%.

IEMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs -1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IEMG and ADP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer