PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IEFV.L vs. XDEM.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IEFV.L vs. XDEM.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (IEFV.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IEFV.L is traded in GBp, while XDEM.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the XDEM.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEFV.L achieves a 11.85% return, which is significantly lower than XDEM.DE's 19.70% return. Over the past 10 years, IEFV.L has underperformed XDEM.DE with an annualized return of 12.02%, while XDEM.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 16.59% annualized return.


IEFV.L

1D
-0.12%
1M
3.20%
YTD
11.85%
6M
14.76%
1Y
33.90%
3Y*
21.37%
5Y*
14.28%
10Y*
12.02%

XDEM.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
5.15%
YTD
19.70%
6M
19.88%
1Y
32.82%
3Y*
26.08%
5Y*
14.56%
10Y*
16.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEFV.L vs. XDEM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IEFV.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF
11.85%42.20%5.40%11.41%1.47%18.58%-3.74%15.71%-12.67%14.28%
XDEM.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C
19.70%13.71%32.20%6.02%-8.92%15.94%23.12%24.74%2.23%21.03%

Correlation

The correlation between IEFV.L and XDEM.DE is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 19, 2015

0.58

The correlation between IEFV.L and XDEM.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (3 years) to 0.58 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IEFV.L vs. XDEM.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEFV.L
IEFV.L Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
IEFV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEFV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEFV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
IEFV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEFV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

XDEM.DE
XDEM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
XDEM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEFV.L vs. XDEM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (IEFV.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IEFV.LXDEM.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.36

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.19

3.79

-0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.73

14.33

-2.60

IEFV.L vs. XDEM.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEFV.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is comparable to the XDEM.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEFV.L and XDEM.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IEFV.LXDEM.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.54

2.03

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.85

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

0.92

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.43

+0.13

Drawdowns

IEFV.L vs. XDEM.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEFV.L drawdown since its inception was -34.64%, which is greater than XDEM.DE's maximum drawdown of -29.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEFV.L and XDEM.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IEFV.LXDEM.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.64%

-29.11%

-5.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.57%

-8.82%

-1.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.02%

-21.17%

+6.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.16%

-21.17%

+5.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.64%

-23.22%

-11.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.66%

-2.54%

+0.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.21%

-7.46%

+1.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.88%

2.34%

+0.54%

Volatility

IEFV.L vs. XDEM.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (IEFV.L) is 3.71%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.DE) has a volatility of 5.83%. This indicates that IEFV.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDEM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IEFV.LXDEM.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.71%

5.83%

-2.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.75%

13.98%

-3.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.32%

16.49%

-3.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.08%

16.85%

+0.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.63%

17.93%

-0.30%

IEFV.L vs. XDEM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IEFV.L and XDEM.DE have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IEFV.L vs. XDEM.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither IEFV.L nor XDEM.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IEFV.L and XDEM.DE have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IEFV.L and XDEM.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

IEFV.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while XDEM.DE is Momentum. IEFV.L tracks MSCI Europe Value NR EUR, while XDEM.DE tracks MSCI World Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and DWS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IEFV.L and XDEM.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer