PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IEFV.L vs. CEMR.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IEFV.L vs. CEMR.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (IEFV.L) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (CEMR.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IEFV.L is traded in GBp, while CEMR.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the CEMR.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEFV.L achieves a 11.85% return, which is significantly higher than CEMR.DE's 6.15% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IEFV.L having a 12.02% annualized return and CEMR.DE not far ahead at 12.54%.


IEFV.L

1D
-0.12%
1M
3.20%
YTD
11.85%
6M
14.76%
1Y
33.90%
3Y*
21.37%
5Y*
14.28%
10Y*
12.02%

CEMR.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
1.93%
YTD
6.15%
6M
9.29%
1Y
19.00%
3Y*
20.46%
5Y*
11.45%
10Y*
12.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEFV.L vs. CEMR.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IEFV.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF
11.85%42.20%5.40%11.41%1.47%18.58%-3.74%15.71%-12.67%14.28%
CEMR.DE
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF
6.15%33.87%14.79%10.51%-10.68%13.51%17.10%24.71%-9.41%16.31%

Correlation

The correlation between IEFV.L and CEMR.DE is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 19, 2015

0.72

The correlation between IEFV.L and CEMR.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IEFV.L vs. CEMR.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEFV.L
IEFV.L Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
IEFV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEFV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEFV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
IEFV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEFV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

CEMR.DE
CEMR.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
CEMR.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEMR.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEMR.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
CEMR.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEMR.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEFV.L vs. CEMR.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (IEFV.L) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (CEMR.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IEFV.LCEMR.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.22

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.19

1.57

+1.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.73

5.84

+5.89

IEFV.L vs. CEMR.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEFV.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is higher than the CEMR.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEFV.L and CEMR.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IEFV.LCEMR.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.54

1.16

+1.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.70

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

0.76

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.69

-0.13

Drawdowns

IEFV.L vs. CEMR.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEFV.L drawdown since its inception was -34.64%, which is greater than CEMR.DE's maximum drawdown of -24.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEFV.L and CEMR.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IEFV.LCEMR.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.64%

-24.16%

-10.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.57%

-12.37%

+1.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.02%

-13.31%

-1.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.16%

-21.45%

+5.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.64%

-24.16%

-10.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.66%

-2.41%

+0.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.21%

-5.10%

-1.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.88%

3.34%

-0.46%

Volatility

IEFV.L vs. CEMR.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (IEFV.L) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (CEMR.DE) have volatilities of 3.71% and 3.79%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IEFV.LCEMR.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.71%

3.79%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.75%

14.27%

-3.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.32%

16.75%

-3.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.08%

16.13%

+0.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.63%

16.36%

+1.27%

IEFV.L vs. CEMR.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IEFV.L and CEMR.DE have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IEFV.L vs. CEMR.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither IEFV.L nor CEMR.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IEFV.L and CEMR.DE have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IEFV.L and CEMR.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

IEFV.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while CEMR.DE is Momentum. IEFV.L tracks MSCI Europe Value NR EUR, while CEMR.DE tracks MSCI Europe Momentum Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IEFV.L and CEMR.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer