PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IEFM.L vs. WMVG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IEFM.L vs. WMVG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (IEFM.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (WMVG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IEFM.L is traded in GBp, while WMVG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the WMVG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEFM.L achieves a 6.32% return, which is significantly higher than WMVG.L's 1.26% return.


IEFM.L

1D
0.21%
1M
2.16%
YTD
6.32%
6M
9.51%
1Y
19.03%
3Y*
20.47%
5Y*
11.30%
10Y*
12.57%

WMVG.L

1D
-0.37%
1M
1.52%
YTD
1.26%
6M
2.42%
1Y
2.81%
3Y*
9.88%
5Y*
6.05%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEFM.L vs. WMVG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IEFM.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF
6.32%33.05%15.03%10.37%-9.80%14.07%17.04%15.98%
WMVG.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc)
1.26%9.07%14.47%7.36%-8.31%16.96%-1.30%11.93%

Correlation

The correlation between IEFM.L and WMVG.L is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2019

0.56

Over the past year, the correlation between IEFM.L and WMVG.L has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.56, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IEFM.L vs. WMVG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IEFM.L
WMVG.L

Financial Services

23.8%
14.0%

Healthcare

15.7%
13.8%

Industrials

15.0%
9.2%

Utilities

11.9%
8.0%

Energy

10.3%
4.5%

Technology

9.2%
20.1%

Basic Materials

7.6%
1.1%

Consumer Defensive

2.9%
10.9%

Communication Services

2.8%
12.1%

Consumer Cyclical

0.5%
5.6%

Real Estate

0.4%
0.7%

Financial Services

IEFM.L
23.8%
WMVG.L
14.0%

Healthcare

IEFM.L
15.7%
WMVG.L
13.8%

Industrials

IEFM.L
15.0%
WMVG.L
9.2%

Utilities

IEFM.L
11.9%
WMVG.L
8.0%

Energy

IEFM.L
10.3%
WMVG.L
4.5%

Technology

IEFM.L
9.2%
WMVG.L
20.1%

Basic Materials

IEFM.L
7.6%
WMVG.L
1.1%

Consumer Defensive

IEFM.L
2.9%
WMVG.L
10.9%

Communication Services

IEFM.L
2.8%
WMVG.L
12.1%

Consumer Cyclical

IEFM.L
0.5%
WMVG.L
5.6%

Real Estate

IEFM.L
0.4%
WMVG.L
0.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IEFM.L vs. WMVG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEFM.L
IEFM.L Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
IEFM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEFM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEFM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
IEFM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEFM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

WMVG.L
WMVG.L Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
WMVG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WMVG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
WMVG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
WMVG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
WMVG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEFM.L vs. WMVG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (IEFM.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (WMVG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IEFM.LWMVG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.07

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.57

0.57

+1.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.80

1.39

+4.42

IEFM.L vs. WMVG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEFM.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is higher than the WMVG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEFM.L and WMVG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IEFM.LWMVG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.18

0.38

+0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.61

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.56

+0.16

Drawdowns

IEFM.L vs. WMVG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEFM.L drawdown since its inception was -23.88%, smaller than the maximum WMVG.L drawdown of -28.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEFM.L and WMVG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IEFM.LWMVG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.88%

-28.25%

+4.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.05%

-4.93%

-7.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.95%

-9.07%

-3.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.33%

-15.18%

-6.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.17%

-3.25%

+1.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.04%

-4.11%

-0.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.27%

2.02%

+1.25%

Volatility

IEFM.L vs. WMVG.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (IEFM.L) has a higher volatility of 3.42% compared to iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (WMVG.L) at 2.22%. This indicates that IEFM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WMVG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IEFM.LWMVG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.42%

2.22%

+1.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.84%

5.01%

+8.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.06%

7.31%

+8.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.62%

9.99%

+5.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.94%

12.15%

+3.79%

IEFM.L vs. WMVG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEFM.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than WMVG.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

IEFM.L vs. WMVG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IEFM.L nor WMVG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IEFM.L and WMVG.L have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IEFM.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IEFM.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for WMVG.L.

IEFM.L is categorized as Momentum, while WMVG.L is Global Equities. IEFM.L tracks MSCI Europe Momentum Index, while WMVG.L tracks MSCI World Minimum Volatility. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IEFM.L and 0.35% for WMVG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IEFM.L and WMVG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer