IEFM.L vs. WMVG.L
IEFM.L (iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF) and WMVG.L (iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - IEFM.L is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI Europe Momentum Index, while WMVG.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Minimum Volatility. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IEFM.L returned 11.30%/yr vs 6.05%/yr for WMVG.L. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IEFM.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for WMVG.L.
Performance
IEFM.L vs. WMVG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IEFM.L is traded in GBp, while WMVG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the WMVG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IEFM.L achieves a 6.32% return, which is significantly higher than WMVG.L's 1.26% return.
IEFM.L
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 2.16%
- YTD
- 6.32%
- 6M
- 9.51%
- 1Y
- 19.03%
- 3Y*
- 20.47%
- 5Y*
- 11.30%
- 10Y*
- 12.57%
WMVG.L
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 1.52%
- YTD
- 1.26%
- 6M
- 2.42%
- 1Y
- 2.81%
- 3Y*
- 9.88%
- 5Y*
- 6.05%
- 10Y*
- —
IEFM.L vs. WMVG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEFM.L iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF | 6.32% | 33.05% | 15.03% | 10.37% | -9.80% | 14.07% | 17.04% | 15.98% |
WMVG.L iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) | 1.26% | 9.07% | 14.47% | 7.36% | -8.31% | 16.96% | -1.30% | 11.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between IEFM.L and WMVG.L is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2019 | 0.56 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IEFM.L and WMVG.L has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.56, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IEFM.L vs. WMVG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IEFM.L
WMVG.L
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Energy
Technology
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Financial Services
IEFM.L
WMVG.L
Healthcare
IEFM.L
WMVG.L
Industrials
IEFM.L
WMVG.L
Utilities
IEFM.L
WMVG.L
Energy
IEFM.L
WMVG.L
Technology
IEFM.L
WMVG.L
Basic Materials
IEFM.L
WMVG.L
Consumer Defensive
IEFM.L
WMVG.L
Communication Services
IEFM.L
WMVG.L
Consumer Cyclical
IEFM.L
WMVG.L
Real Estate
IEFM.L
WMVG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IEFM.L vs. WMVG.L — Risk / Return Rank
IEFM.L
WMVG.L
IEFM.L vs. WMVG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (IEFM.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (WMVG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IEFM.L | WMVG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.07 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.57 | 0.57 | +1.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.80 | 1.39 | +4.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IEFM.L | WMVG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.18 | 0.38 | +0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 0.61 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.56 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
IEFM.L vs. WMVG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IEFM.L drawdown since its inception was -23.88%, smaller than the maximum WMVG.L drawdown of -28.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEFM.L and WMVG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IEFM.L | WMVG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.88% | -28.25% | +4.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.05% | -4.93% | -7.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.95% | -9.07% | -3.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.33% | -15.18% | -6.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.17% | -3.25% | +1.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.04% | -4.11% | -0.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.27% | 2.02% | +1.25% |
Volatility
IEFM.L vs. WMVG.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (IEFM.L) has a higher volatility of 3.42% compared to iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (WMVG.L) at 2.22%. This indicates that IEFM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WMVG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IEFM.L | WMVG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.42% | 2.22% | +1.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.84% | 5.01% | +8.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.06% | 7.31% | +8.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.62% | 9.99% | +5.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.94% | 12.15% | +3.79% |
IEFM.L vs. WMVG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IEFM.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than WMVG.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
IEFM.L vs. WMVG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IEFM.L nor WMVG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IEFM.L and WMVG.L have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IEFM.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IEFM.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for WMVG.L.
IEFM.L is categorized as Momentum, while WMVG.L is Global Equities. IEFM.L tracks MSCI Europe Momentum Index, while WMVG.L tracks MSCI World Minimum Volatility. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IEFM.L and 0.35% for WMVG.L.
Find the right allocation for IEFM.L and WMVG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer