PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IEFA vs. MDCPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IEFA vs. MDCPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) and BlackRock Balanced Capital Fund Investor A Shares (MDCPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEFA achieves a 7.49% return, which is significantly higher than MDCPX's 6.42% return. Over the past 10 years, IEFA has underperformed MDCPX with an annualized return of 9.37%, while MDCPX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.99% annualized return.


IEFA

1D
0.63%
1M
-1.17%
YTD
7.49%
6M
10.04%
1Y
19.61%
3Y*
16.13%
5Y*
7.82%
10Y*
9.37%

MDCPX

1D
-1.99%
1M
-0.68%
YTD
6.42%
6M
7.39%
1Y
16.87%
3Y*
14.13%
5Y*
7.95%
10Y*
9.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEFA vs. MDCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IEFA
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
7.49%32.08%3.26%17.95%-15.24%11.63%8.18%22.64%-14.14%26.57%
MDCPX
BlackRock Balanced Capital Fund Investor A Shares
6.42%15.32%12.47%16.59%-15.70%16.49%15.07%21.59%-3.48%14.24%

Correlation

The correlation between IEFA and MDCPX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2012

0.82

The correlation between IEFA and MDCPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IEFA vs. MDCPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEFA
IEFA Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
IEFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEFA Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
IEFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEFA Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

MDCPX
MDCPX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
MDCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
MDCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEFA vs. MDCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) and BlackRock Balanced Capital Fund Investor A Shares (MDCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IEFAMDCPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.38

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.71

2.80

-1.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.52

12.12

-5.61

IEFA vs. MDCPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEFA Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is lower than the MDCPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEFA and MDCPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IEFAMDCPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.30

2.04

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.72

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.87

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.66

-0.15

Drawdowns

IEFA vs. MDCPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEFA drawdown since its inception was -34.78%, smaller than the maximum MDCPX drawdown of -41.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEFA and MDCPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IEFAMDCPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.78%

-41.98%

+7.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.50%

-6.22%

-5.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.76%

-10.65%

-3.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.41%

-21.99%

-8.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.78%

-24.58%

-10.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.44%

-2.36%

-0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.69%

-5.09%

-1.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

1.43%

+1.59%

Volatility

IEFA vs. MDCPX - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) has a higher volatility of 4.54% compared to BlackRock Balanced Capital Fund Investor A Shares (MDCPX) at 3.07%. This indicates that IEFA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDCPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IEFAMDCPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.54%

3.07%

+1.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.74%

7.03%

+5.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.22%

8.55%

+6.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.55%

11.09%

+5.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.32%

11.48%

+5.84%

IEFA vs. MDCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEFA has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than MDCPX's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

IEFA vs. MDCPX - Dividend Comparison

IEFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.30%, less than MDCPX's 8.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IEFA
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
3.30%3.55%3.47%3.20%2.70%3.32%1.90%3.18%3.46%2.57%2.96%2.63%
MDCPX
BlackRock Balanced Capital Fund Investor A Shares
8.09%8.61%7.44%2.63%3.82%12.27%4.02%5.25%7.84%19.39%4.67%5.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


IEFA and MDCPX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IEFA has higher volatility (4.54%) compared to MDCPX (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IEFA dropped -34.78% vs MDCPX's -41.98%.

MDCPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IEFA and MDCPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer