IEF vs. VRP
IEF (iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF) and VRP (Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IEF is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 7-10 Year Bond Index, while VRP is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund tracking the Wells Fargo Hybrid and Preferred Securities Floating and Variable Rate Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IEF returned 0.53%/yr vs 5.21%/yr for VRP. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IEF charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for VRP.
Performance
IEF vs. VRP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IEF achieves a -1.16% return, which is significantly lower than VRP's 1.98% return. Over the past 10 years, IEF has underperformed VRP with an annualized return of 0.53%, while VRP has yielded a comparatively higher 5.21% annualized return.
IEF
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -1.19%
- YTD
- -1.16%
- 6M
- -0.96%
- 1Y
- 3.91%
- 3Y*
- 2.43%
- 5Y*
- -1.34%
- 10Y*
- 0.53%
VRP
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- 1.98%
- 6M
- 2.44%
- 1Y
- 6.69%
- 3Y*
- 9.63%
- 5Y*
- 4.33%
- 10Y*
- 5.21%
IEF vs. VRP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEF iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF | -1.16% | 8.03% | -0.63% | 3.64% | -15.15% | -3.33% | 10.01% | 8.03% | 0.99% | 2.55% |
VRP Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF | 1.98% | 7.34% | 11.10% | 10.35% | -9.00% | 4.20% | 5.11% | 18.84% | -6.62% | 9.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between IEF and VRP is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2014 | 0.11 |
Over the past year, IEF and VRP have become more correlated (0.35) than their long-term average of 0.11, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IEF vs. VRP — Risk / Return Rank
IEF
VRP
IEF vs. VRP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF (IEF) and Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF (VRP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IEF | VRP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.51 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.96 | 2.33 | -1.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.79 | 12.52 | -9.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IEF | VRP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 | 2.33 | -1.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.17 | 0.66 | -0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.08 | 0.36 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.38 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
IEF vs. VRP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IEF drawdown since its inception was -23.93%, smaller than the maximum VRP drawdown of -46.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEF and VRP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IEF | VRP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.93% | -46.04% | +22.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.07% | -2.89% | -1.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.74% | -4.26% | -3.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.40% | -13.76% | -7.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.93% | -46.04% | +22.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.80% | -0.25% | -11.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.35% | -2.31% | -3.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.40% | 0.54% | +0.86% |
Volatility
IEF vs. VRP - Volatility Comparison
iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF (IEF) has a higher volatility of 1.51% compared to Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF (VRP) at 0.63%. This indicates that IEF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IEF | VRP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.51% | 0.63% | +0.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.36% | 2.33% | +1.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.69% | 2.90% | +1.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.71% | 6.55% | +1.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.63% | 14.53% | -7.90% |
IEF vs. VRP - Expense Ratio Comparison
IEF has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than VRP's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
IEF vs. VRP - Dividend Comparison
IEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%, less than VRP's 6.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEF iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF | 3.92% | 3.77% | 3.62% | 2.91% | 1.96% | 0.83% | 1.08% | 2.08% | 2.24% | 1.82% | 1.81% | 1.90% |
VRP Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF | 6.31% | 6.53% | 5.78% | 6.61% | 5.38% | 4.25% | 4.17% | 4.71% | 5.28% | 4.69% | 5.10% | 5.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IEF and VRP have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IEF has higher volatility (1.51%) compared to VRP (0.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IEF dropped -23.93% vs VRP's -46.04%.
On 10-year performance, VRP leads with 5.21% vs 0.53% for IEF. On fees, IEF is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, VRP has been the lower-risk option at 0.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VRP has performed better with a 5.21% return vs 0.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IEF is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for VRP.
VRP has the higher dividend yield at 6.31%, compared with 3.92% for IEF.
IEF is categorized as Government Bonds, while VRP is Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds. IEF tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 7-10 Year Bond Index, while VRP tracks Wells Fargo Hybrid and Preferred Securities Floating and Variable Rate Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IEF and 0.50% for VRP.
VRP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IEF and VRP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer