IEAC.AS vs. IS0E.DE
IEAC.AS (iShares Core € Corp Bond UCITS ETF) and IS0E.DE (iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IEAC.AS is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Euro Corporate Bond Index, while IS0E.DE is a Precious Metals fund tracking the S&P Commodity Producers Gold. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IEAC.AS returned 1.02%/yr vs 13.92%/yr for IS0E.DE. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IEAC.AS charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for IS0E.DE.
Performance
IEAC.AS vs. IS0E.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IEAC.AS achieves a 0.58% return, which is significantly higher than IS0E.DE's -0.06% return. Over the past 10 years, IEAC.AS has underperformed IS0E.DE with an annualized return of 1.02%, while IS0E.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 13.92% annualized return.
IEAC.AS
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.40%
- YTD
- 0.58%
- 6M
- 0.54%
- 1Y
- 2.06%
- 3Y*
- 4.59%
- 5Y*
- 0.07%
- 10Y*
- 1.02%
IS0E.DE
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- -6.27%
- YTD
- -0.06%
- 6M
- 8.72%
- 1Y
- 63.71%
- 3Y*
- 38.14%
- 5Y*
- 19.77%
- 10Y*
- 13.92%
IEAC.AS vs. IS0E.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEAC.AS iShares Core € Corp Bond UCITS ETF | 0.58% | 3.05% | 4.40% | 7.74% | -13.63% | -1.02% | 2.55% | 6.29% | -1.52% | 2.20% |
IS0E.DE iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF | -0.06% | 129.59% | 18.76% | 6.29% | -3.80% | -3.04% | 13.47% | 44.05% | -4.38% | -6.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between IEAC.AS and IS0E.DE is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2012 | 0.20 |
The correlation between IEAC.AS and IS0E.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (all time) to 0.35 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IEAC.AS vs. IS0E.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IEAC.AS
IS0E.DE
IEAC.AS vs. IS0E.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core € Corp Bond UCITS ETF (IEAC.AS) and iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF (IS0E.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IEAC.AS | IS0E.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.24 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.77 | 2.17 | -1.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.68 | 5.45 | -2.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IEAC.AS | IS0E.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 | 1.24 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 | 0.58 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 | 0.43 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 0.18 | +0.60 |
Drawdowns
IEAC.AS vs. IS0E.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IEAC.AS drawdown since its inception was -17.26%, smaller than the maximum IS0E.DE drawdown of -71.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEAC.AS and IS0E.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IEAC.AS | IS0E.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.26% | -71.63% | +54.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.65% | -27.26% | +24.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.65% | -27.26% | +24.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.26% | -38.03% | +20.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.26% | -45.62% | +28.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.99% | -22.93% | +21.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.73% | -33.74% | +31.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.76% | 10.85% | -10.09% |
Volatility
IEAC.AS vs. IS0E.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core € Corp Bond UCITS ETF (IEAC.AS) is 1.15%, while iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF (IS0E.DE) has a volatility of 12.84%. This indicates that IEAC.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IS0E.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IEAC.AS | IS0E.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.15% | 12.84% | -11.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.67% | 33.62% | -30.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.02% | 47.58% | -44.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.42% | 33.83% | -29.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.34% | 32.53% | -28.19% |
IEAC.AS vs. IS0E.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IEAC.AS has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than IS0E.DE's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
IEAC.AS vs. IS0E.DE - Dividend Comparison
IEAC.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%, while IS0E.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEAC.AS iShares Core € Corp Bond UCITS ETF | 3.33% | 3.29% | 3.39% | 2.51% | 0.84% | 0.81% | 0.84% | 1.10% | 0.98% | 1.52% | 1.66% | 0.90% |
IS0E.DE iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IEAC.AS and IS0E.DE have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IEAC.AS is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IEAC.AS is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for IS0E.DE.
IEAC.AS is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while IS0E.DE is Precious Metals. IEAC.AS tracks Bloomberg Euro Corporate Bond Index, while IS0E.DE tracks S&P Commodity Producers Gold. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IEAC.AS and 0.55% for IS0E.DE.
Find the right allocation for IEAC.AS and IS0E.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer