IDVO vs. ENCC.TO
IDVO (Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF) and ENCC.TO (Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, IDVO returned 22.06%/yr vs 20.52%/yr for ENCC.TO. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IDVO charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for ENCC.TO.
Performance
IDVO vs. ENCC.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IDVO is traded in USD, while ENCC.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the ENCC.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDVO achieves a 11.49% return, which is significantly lower than ENCC.TO's 25.92% return.
IDVO
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -2.10%
- YTD
- 11.49%
- 6M
- 12.59%
- 1Y
- 31.78%
- 3Y*
- 22.06%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ENCC.TO
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 2.31%
- YTD
- 25.92%
- 6M
- 24.63%
- 1Y
- 38.16%
- 3Y*
- 20.52%
- 5Y*
- 21.64%
- 10Y*
- 7.53%
IDVO vs. ENCC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDVO Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 11.49% | 36.46% | 10.16% | 17.53% | 5.47% |
ENCC.TO Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF | 25.92% | 18.54% | 8.23% | 8.29% | -0.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDVO and ENCC.TO is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2022 | 0.38 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IDVO and ENCC.TO has dropped to 0.00 - well below their long-term average of 0.38, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IDVO vs. ENCC.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IDVO
ENCC.TO
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
Technology
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Real Estate
-
-
Financial Services
IDVO
ENCC.TO
-
Basic Materials
IDVO
ENCC.TO
-
Energy
IDVO
ENCC.TO
Industrials
IDVO
ENCC.TO
-
Communication Services
IDVO
ENCC.TO
-
Technology
IDVO
ENCC.TO
-
Healthcare
IDVO
ENCC.TO
-
Consumer Defensive
IDVO
ENCC.TO
-
Utilities
IDVO
ENCC.TO
-
Consumer Cyclical
IDVO
ENCC.TO
-
Real Estate
IDVO
-
ENCC.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDVO vs. ENCC.TO — Risk / Return Rank
IDVO
ENCC.TO
IDVO vs. ENCC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (IDVO) and Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF (ENCC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IDVO | ENCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.43 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.08 | 5.14 | -2.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.84 | 15.24 | -3.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IDVO | ENCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.00 | 2.57 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.90 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.25 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.32 | -0.15 | +1.47 |
Drawdowns
IDVO vs. ENCC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDVO drawdown since its inception was -15.46%, smaller than the maximum ENCC.TO drawdown of -95.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDVO and ENCC.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDVO | ENCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.46% | -95.55% | +80.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.37% | -7.46% | -2.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.46% | -18.42% | +2.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -83.55% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.52% | -49.96% | +46.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.30% | -65.16% | +62.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.69% | 2.51% | +0.18% |
Volatility
IDVO vs. ENCC.TO - Volatility Comparison
Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (IDVO) and Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF (ENCC.TO) have volatilities of 5.30% and 5.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDVO | ENCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.30% | 5.32% | -0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.50% | 12.71% | +0.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.02% | 14.97% | +1.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.43% | 24.11% | -7.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.43% | 30.17% | -13.74% |
IDVO vs. ENCC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDVO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than ENCC.TO's 0.76% expense ratio.
Dividends
IDVO vs. ENCC.TO - Dividend Comparison
IDVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.61%, less than ENCC.TO's 11.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENCC.TO Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF | 11.16% | 13.62% | 14.58% | 14.87% | 12.55% | 4.23% | 5.10% | 6.11% | 8.37% | 6.93% | 4.34% | 3.03% |
IDVO Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 5.61% | 5.42% | 6.14% | 5.72% | 1.96% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDVO and ENCC.TO have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IDVO is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IDVO is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for ENCC.TO.
They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for IDVO and 0.76% for ENCC.TO.
Find the right allocation for IDVO and ENCC.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer