IDVO vs. 3199.HK

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

IDVO (Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF) and 3199.HK (ICBC CSOP FTSE Chinese Government and Policy Bank Bond Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IDVO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Amplify, while 3199.HK is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the FTSE Chinese Government and Policy Bank Bond. IDVO is actively managed, while 3199.HK is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IDVO returned 22.06%/yr vs 5.64%/yr for 3199.HK. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IDVO charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for 3199.HK.

Performance

IDVO vs. 3199.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (IDVO) and ICBC CSOP FTSE Chinese Government and Policy Bank Bond Index ETF (3199.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

IDVO is traded in USD, while 3199.HK is traded in HKD. To make them comparable, the 3199.HK values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDVO achieves a 11.49% return, which is significantly higher than 3199.HK's 5.28% return.

IDVO

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: -2.10%
• YTD: 11.49%
• 6M: 12.59%
• 1Y: 31.78%
• 3Y*: 22.06%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

3199.HK

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 0.89%
• YTD: 5.28%
• 6M: 6.23%
• 1Y: 7.98%
• 3Y*: 5.64%
• 5Y*: 2.68%
• 10Y*: 2.83%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDVO vs. 3199.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
IDVO Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF	11.49%	36.46%	10.16%	17.53%	5.47%
3199.HK ICBC CSOP FTSE Chinese Government and Policy Bank Bond Index ETF	5.28%	5.29%	3.79%	2.32%	-0.47%

Correlation

The correlation between IDVO and 3199.HK is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.03
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2022	0.07

Return for Risk

IDVO vs. 3199.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDVO

IDVO Risk / Return Rank: 67
IDVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
IDVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
IDVO Omega Ratio Rank: 67
IDVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
IDVO Martin Ratio Rank: 70

3199.HK

3199.HK Risk / Return Rank: 64
3199.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
3199.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
3199.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 53
3199.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
3199.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDVO vs. 3199.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (IDVO) and ICBC CSOP FTSE Chinese Government and Policy Bank Bond Index ETF (3199.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IDVO	3199.HK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.00	1.76	+0.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.67	2.69	-0.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.33	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.08	5.65	-2.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.84	18.84	-7.00
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IDVO vs. 3199.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDVO Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the 3199.HK Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDVO and 3199.HK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IDVO	3199.HK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.00	1.76	+0.24
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.53	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.57	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.32	0.54	+0.78

Drawdowns

IDVO vs. 3199.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDVO drawdown since its inception was -15.46%, which is greater than 3199.HK's maximum drawdown of -11.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDVO and 3199.HK.

Drawdown Indicators

	IDVO	3199.HK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.46%	-11.56%	-3.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.37%	-1.56%	-8.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.46%	-3.73%	-11.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-11.56%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-11.56%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.52%	-0.38%	-3.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.30%	-3.23%	+0.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.69%	0.45%	+2.24%

Volatility

IDVO vs. 3199.HK - Volatility Comparison

Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (IDVO) has a higher volatility of 5.30% compared to ICBC CSOP FTSE Chinese Government and Policy Bank Bond Index ETF (3199.HK) at 1.52%. This indicates that IDVO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 3199.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IDVO	3199.HK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.30%	1.52%	+3.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.50%	3.84%	+9.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.02%	4.99%	+11.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.43%	5.81%	+10.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.43%	5.78%	+10.65%

IDVO vs. 3199.HK - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDVO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than 3199.HK's 0.62% expense ratio.

Dividends

IDVO vs. 3199.HK - Dividend Comparison

IDVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.61%, more than 3199.HK's 3.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
3199.HK ICBC CSOP FTSE Chinese Government and Policy Bank Bond Index ETF	3.31%	3.34%	3.43%	3.51%	3.65%	3.40%	3.29%	3.57%	3.62%	3.39%	3.56%	3.69%
IDVO Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF	5.61%	5.42%	6.14%	5.72%	1.96%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IDVO and 3199.HK in my portfolio?

IDVO and 3199.HK have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IDVO or 3199.HK?

On fees, 3199.HK is cheaper at 0.62% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IDVO or 3199.HK?

3199.HK is cheaper with a 0.62% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IDVO.

What is the main difference between IDVO and 3199.HK?

IDVO is categorized as Derivative Income, while 3199.HK is Emerging Markets Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and CSOP. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for IDVO and 0.62% for 3199.HK.