IDV vs. EMBE.L
IDV (iShares International Select Dividend ETF) and EMBE.L (iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - IDV is a Global Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones EPAC Select Dividend, while EMBE.L is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the JPM EMBI Global Diversified Hedge TR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IDV returned 10.33%/yr vs 1.17%/yr for EMBE.L. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IDV charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for EMBE.L.
Performance
IDV vs. EMBE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IDV is traded in USD, while EMBE.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the EMBE.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDV achieves a 10.84% return, which is significantly higher than EMBE.L's -1.42% return. Over the past 10 years, IDV has outperformed EMBE.L with an annualized return of 10.33%, while EMBE.L has yielded a comparatively lower 1.17% annualized return.
IDV
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -2.36%
- YTD
- 10.84%
- 6M
- 14.01%
- 1Y
- 33.84%
- 3Y*
- 24.24%
- 5Y*
- 11.70%
- 10Y*
- 10.33%
EMBE.L
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -2.61%
- YTD
- -1.42%
- 6M
- 0.22%
- 1Y
- 9.86%
- 3Y*
- 9.74%
- 5Y*
- -1.66%
- 10Y*
- 1.17%
IDV vs. EMBE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDV iShares International Select Dividend ETF | 10.84% | 52.16% | 4.00% | 10.32% | -6.40% | 12.00% | -5.94% | 23.56% | -10.37% | 19.74% |
EMBE.L iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) | -1.42% | 25.90% | -2.43% | 11.06% | -25.61% | -9.86% | 12.50% | 10.09% | -12.68% | 23.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDV and EMBE.L is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2013 | 0.47 |
The correlation between IDV and EMBE.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (all time) to 0.57 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IDV vs. EMBE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IDV
EMBE.L
Financial Services
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Healthcare
-
-
Financial Services
IDV
EMBE.L
Energy
IDV
EMBE.L
-
Utilities
IDV
EMBE.L
-
Communication Services
IDV
EMBE.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
IDV
EMBE.L
-
Consumer Defensive
IDV
EMBE.L
-
Industrials
IDV
EMBE.L
-
Basic Materials
IDV
EMBE.L
-
Real Estate
IDV
EMBE.L
-
Technology
IDV
EMBE.L
-
Healthcare
IDV
-
EMBE.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDV vs. EMBE.L — Risk / Return Rank
IDV
EMBE.L
IDV vs. EMBE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV) and iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) (EMBE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IDV | EMBE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.18 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.99 | 1.23 | +2.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.00 | 4.00 | +11.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IDV | EMBE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.63 | 1.00 | +1.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | -0.12 | +0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | 0.09 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.09 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
IDV vs. EMBE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDV drawdown since its inception was -70.14%, which is greater than EMBE.L's maximum drawdown of -44.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDV and EMBE.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDV | EMBE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.14% | -44.54% | -25.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.52% | -8.00% | -0.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.86% | -13.39% | +1.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.19% | -43.05% | +13.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.50% | -44.54% | +2.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.08% | -10.21% | +6.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.39% | -15.00% | -0.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.26% | 2.46% | -0.20% |
Volatility
IDV vs. EMBE.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV) has a higher volatility of 3.91% compared to iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) (EMBE.L) at 3.04%. This indicates that IDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMBE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDV | EMBE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.91% | 3.04% | +0.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.71% | 7.40% | +3.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.96% | 9.82% | +3.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.56% | 13.68% | +1.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.94% | 13.37% | +4.57% |
IDV vs. EMBE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDV has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than EMBE.L's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
IDV vs. EMBE.L - Dividend Comparison
IDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, less than EMBE.L's 5.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMBE.L iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) | 5.66% | 5.44% | 5.64% | 5.50% | 5.39% | 3.92% | 3.85% | 4.77% | 5.75% | 3.88% | 5.36% | 4.72% |
IDV iShares International Select Dividend ETF | 4.51% | 4.94% | 6.46% | 6.51% | 7.33% | 5.78% | 5.47% | 5.15% | 5.93% | 4.52% | 4.69% | 5.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDV and EMBE.L have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IDV is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IDV is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EMBE.L.
IDV is categorized as Global Equities, while EMBE.L is Emerging Markets Bonds. IDV tracks Dow Jones EPAC Select Dividend, while EMBE.L tracks JPM EMBI Global Diversified Hedge TR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for IDV and 0.50% for EMBE.L.
Find the right allocation for IDV and EMBE.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer