PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDT vs. JBL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

IDT vs. JBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IDT Corporation (IDT) and Jabil Inc. (JBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDT achieves a 7.74% return, which is significantly lower than JBL's 59.70% return. Over the past 10 years, IDT has underperformed JBL with an annualized return of 18.43%, while JBL has yielded a comparatively higher 35.40% annualized return.


IDT

1D
-1.77%
1M
2.91%
YTD
7.74%
6M
15.07%
1Y
-19.36%
3Y*
26.67%
5Y*
6.31%
10Y*
18.43%

JBL

1D
3.03%
1M
2.50%
YTD
59.70%
6M
61.54%
1Y
106.33%
3Y*
57.02%
5Y*
45.20%
10Y*
35.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDT vs. JBL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IDT
IDT Corporation
7.74%8.22%40.09%21.02%-36.21%257.28%71.43%16.48%-29.46%-38.46%
JBL
Jabil Inc.
59.70%58.73%13.25%87.43%-2.55%66.40%3.89%68.49%-4.41%12.17%

Correlation

The correlation between IDT and JBL is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2001

0.26

Over the past year, the correlation between IDT and JBL has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.26, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

IDT:

$1.37B

JBL:

$39.16B

EPS

IDT:

$3.26

JBL:

$7.47

PE Ratio

IDT:

16.92

JBL:

48.75

PEG Ratio

IDT:

1.17

JBL:

2.61

PS Ratio

IDT:

1.09

JBL:

1.21

PB Ratio

IDT:

3.84

JBL:

29.14

Total Revenue (TTM)

IDT:

$1.28B

JBL:

$32.67B

Gross Profit (TTM)

IDT:

$476.45M

JBL:

$2.95B

EBITDA (TTM)

IDT:

$130.53M

JBL:

$1.55B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDT vs. JBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDT
IDT Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
IDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDT Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
IDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDT Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

JBL
JBL Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
JBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
JBL Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
JBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
JBL Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDT vs. JBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IDT Corporation (IDT) and Jabil Inc. (JBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IDTJBLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.39

-0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.59

5.99

-6.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.82

15.50

-16.31

IDT vs. JBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDT Sharpe Ratio is -0.61, which is lower than the JBL Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDT and JBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IDTJBLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.61

2.56

-3.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

1.20

-1.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

0.96

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

0.37

-0.24

Drawdowns

IDT vs. JBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDT drawdown since its inception was -99.05%, roughly equal to the maximum JBL drawdown of -94.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDT and JBL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDTJBLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.05%

-94.92%

-4.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.19%

-17.86%

-15.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.19%

-36.83%

+3.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.93%

-36.83%

-30.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.52%

-57.34%

-15.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.88%

-4.29%

-16.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-50.34%

-44.52%

-5.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.78%

6.89%

+16.89%

Volatility

IDT vs. JBL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for IDT Corporation (IDT) is 7.57%, while Jabil Inc. (JBL) has a volatility of 13.15%. This indicates that IDT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDTJBLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.57%

13.15%

-5.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.42%

32.41%

-14.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.79%

41.78%

-9.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.59%

37.80%

+4.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.61%

37.12%

+17.49%

Dividends

IDT vs. JBL - Dividend Comparison

IDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, more than JBL's 0.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDT
IDT Corporation
0.45%0.47%0.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.68%8.96%3.93%11.75%
JBL
Jabil Inc.
0.09%0.14%0.22%0.25%0.47%0.45%0.75%0.77%1.29%1.22%1.35%1.37%

Financials

IDT vs. JBL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between IDT Corporation and Jabil Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B20222023202420252026
315.71M
8.28B
(IDT) Total Revenue
(JBL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

IDT vs. JBL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between IDT Corporation and Jabil Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%20222023202420252026
38.8%
9.0%
Portfolio components
IDT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IDT Corporation reported a gross profit of 122.50M and revenue of 315.71M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.8%.

JBL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Jabil Inc. reported a gross profit of 746.00M and revenue of 8.28B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.0%.

IDT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IDT Corporation reported an operating income of 29.90M and revenue of 315.71M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.5%.

JBL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Jabil Inc. reported an operating income of 374.00M and revenue of 8.28B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.5%.

IDT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IDT Corporation reported a net income of 21.61M and revenue of 315.71M, resulting in a net margin of 6.9%.

JBL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Jabil Inc. reported a net income of 223.00M and revenue of 8.28B, resulting in a net margin of 2.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


IDT and JBL have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JBL has higher volatility (13.15%) compared to IDT (7.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDT dropped -99.05% vs JBL's -94.92%.

JBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDT and JBL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer