IDT vs. FUL
IDT (IDT Corporation) and FUL (H.B. Fuller Company) are both stocks. IDT operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services), while FUL operates in Specialty Chemicals (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, IDT returned 18.43%/yr vs 3.54%/yr for FUL. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
IDT vs. FUL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDT achieves a 7.74% return, which is significantly higher than FUL's 1.73% return. Over the past 10 years, IDT has outperformed FUL with an annualized return of 18.43%, while FUL has yielded a comparatively lower 3.54% annualized return.
IDT
- 1D
- -1.77%
- 1M
- 2.91%
- YTD
- 7.74%
- 6M
- 15.07%
- 1Y
- -19.36%
- 3Y*
- 26.67%
- 5Y*
- 6.31%
- 10Y*
- 18.43%
FUL
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -1.99%
- YTD
- 1.73%
- 6M
- 4.84%
- 1Y
- 8.55%
- 3Y*
- -1.57%
- 5Y*
- -1.62%
- 10Y*
- 3.54%
IDT vs. FUL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDT IDT Corporation | 7.74% | 8.22% | 40.09% | 21.02% | -36.21% | 257.28% | 71.43% | 16.48% | -29.46% | -38.46% |
FUL H.B. Fuller Company | 1.73% | -10.46% | -16.19% | 14.97% | -10.59% | 57.84% | 2.15% | 22.42% | -19.84% | 12.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDT and FUL is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2001 | 0.31 |
The correlation between IDT and FUL shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.33 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
IDT:
$1.37B
FUL:
$3.33B
IDT:
$3.26
FUL:
$2.88
IDT:
16.92
FUL:
20.81
IDT:
1.09
FUL:
0.96
IDT:
3.84
FUL:
1.61
IDT:
$1.28B
FUL:
$3.46B
IDT:
$476.45M
FUL:
$1.11B
IDT:
$130.53M
FUL:
$495.48M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDT vs. FUL — Risk / Return Rank
IDT
FUL
IDT vs. FUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IDT Corporation (IDT) and H.B. Fuller Company (FUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IDT | FUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.07 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.59 | 0.32 | -0.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.82 | 0.98 | -1.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IDT | FUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.61 | 0.25 | -0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | -0.06 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | 0.11 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.13 | 0.27 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
IDT vs. FUL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDT drawdown since its inception was -99.05%, which is greater than FUL's maximum drawdown of -68.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDT and FUL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDT | FUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.05% | -68.25% | -30.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.19% | -26.97% | -6.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.19% | -43.45% | +10.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.93% | -43.45% | -23.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.52% | -56.29% | -16.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.88% | -28.49% | +7.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.34% | -18.76% | -31.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.78% | 8.70% | +15.08% |
Volatility
IDT vs. FUL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for IDT Corporation (IDT) is 7.57%, while H.B. Fuller Company (FUL) has a volatility of 11.03%. This indicates that IDT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDT | FUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.57% | 11.03% | -3.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.42% | 26.42% | -9.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.79% | 34.82% | -3.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.59% | 29.38% | +13.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.61% | 31.11% | +23.50% |
Dividends
IDT vs. FUL - Dividend Comparison
IDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than FUL's 1.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUL H.B. Fuller Company | 1.58% | 1.56% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.03% | 0.82% | 1.25% | 1.23% | 1.44% | 1.10% | 1.14% | 1.40% |
IDT IDT Corporation | 0.45% | 0.47% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.68% | 8.96% | 3.93% | 11.75% |
Financials
IDT vs. FUL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between IDT Corporation and H.B. Fuller Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
IDT vs. FUL - Profitability Comparison
IDT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IDT Corporation reported a gross profit of 122.50M and revenue of 315.71M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.8%.
FUL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, H.B. Fuller Company reported a gross profit of 240.99M and revenue of 770.84M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.3%.
IDT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IDT Corporation reported an operating income of 29.90M and revenue of 315.71M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.5%.
FUL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, H.B. Fuller Company reported an operating income of 60.86M and revenue of 770.84M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.9%.
IDT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IDT Corporation reported a net income of 21.61M and revenue of 315.71M, resulting in a net margin of 6.9%.
FUL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, H.B. Fuller Company reported a net income of 21.05M and revenue of 770.84M, resulting in a net margin of 2.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
IDT and FUL have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FUL has higher volatility (11.03%) compared to IDT (7.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDT dropped -99.05% vs FUL's -68.25%.
FUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.25 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IDT and FUL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer