IDR.MC vs. SMIN.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

IDR.MC (Indra A) and SMIN.L (Smiths Group PLC) are both stocks. IDR.MC operates in Information Technology Services (Technology), while SMIN.L operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, IDR.MC returned 19.36%/yr vs 10.42%/yr for SMIN.L. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

IDR.MC vs. SMIN.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Indra A (IDR.MC) and Smiths Group PLC (SMIN.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

IDR.MC is traded in EUR, while SMIN.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SMIN.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDR.MC achieves a 12.07% return, which is significantly higher than SMIN.L's 8.41% return. Over the past 10 years, IDR.MC has outperformed SMIN.L with an annualized return of 19.36%, while SMIN.L has yielded a comparatively lower 10.42% annualized return.

IDR.MC

• 1D: 1.45%
• 1M: 7.72%
• YTD: 12.07%
• 6M: 11.80%
• 1Y: 56.31%
• 3Y*: 69.82%
• 5Y*: 51.82%
• 10Y*: 19.36%

SMIN.L

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 1.41%
• YTD: 8.41%
• 6M: 8.21%
• 1Y: 12.44%
• 3Y*: 17.13%
• 5Y*: 12.32%
• 10Y*: 10.42%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDR.MC vs. SMIN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IDR.MC Indra A	12.07%	186.12%	23.62%	34.32%	13.68%	36.39%	-31.43%	23.62%	-27.79%	9.56%
SMIN.L Smiths Group PLC	8.41%	32.42%	4.95%	15.63%	-1.39%	14.70%	-13.44%	35.47%	-6.57%	3.89%

Correlation

The correlation between IDR.MC and SMIN.L is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.26
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.31
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.34
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2007	0.35

Return for Risk

IDR.MC vs. SMIN.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDR.MC

IDR.MC Risk / Return Rank: 74
IDR.MC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
IDR.MC Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
IDR.MC Omega Ratio Rank: 72
IDR.MC Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
IDR.MC Martin Ratio Rank: 75

SMIN.L

SMIN.L Risk / Return Rank: 61
SMIN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
SMIN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
SMIN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 60
SMIN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
SMIN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDR.MC vs. SMIN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Indra A (IDR.MC) and Smiths Group PLC (SMIN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IDR.MC	SMIN.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.18	0.54	+0.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.89	0.85	+1.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.13	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.88	0.56	+1.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.74	2.28	+2.46
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IDR.MC vs. SMIN.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDR.MC Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is higher than the SMIN.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDR.MC and SMIN.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IDR.MC	SMIN.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.18	0.54	+0.64
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.45	0.54	+0.91
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55	0.38	+0.17
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.36	0.25	+0.11

Drawdowns

IDR.MC vs. SMIN.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDR.MC drawdown since its inception was -68.69%, which is greater than SMIN.L's maximum drawdown of -58.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDR.MC and SMIN.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	IDR.MC	SMIN.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.69%	-58.89%	-9.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.23%	-22.00%	-8.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.23%	-22.16%	-8.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.68%	-22.16%	-8.52%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-63.01%	-58.89%	-4.12%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.66%	-6.71%	-8.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.34%	-13.83%	-14.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.04%	5.44%	+6.60%

Volatility

IDR.MC vs. SMIN.L - Volatility Comparison

Indra A (IDR.MC) has a higher volatility of 10.99% compared to Smiths Group PLC (SMIN.L) at 5.24%. This indicates that IDR.MC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMIN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IDR.MC	SMIN.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.99%	5.24%	+5.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	39.66%	20.78%	+18.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	48.25%	22.88%	+25.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.17%	23.03%	+12.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.50%	27.30%	+7.20%

Dividends

IDR.MC vs. SMIN.L - Dividend Comparison

IDR.MC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than SMIN.L's 1.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IDR.MC Indra A	0.46%	0.52%	1.46%	1.79%	1.41%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SMIN.L Smiths Group PLC	1.86%	1.96%	2.55%	2.36%	2.48%	2.39%	2.33%	2.72%	3.27%	2.90%	2.97%	4.36%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IDR.MC and SMIN.L in my portfolio?

IDR.MC and SMIN.L have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.