PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDR.MC vs. FII.PA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

IDR.MC vs. FII.PA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Indra A (IDR.MC) and Lisi S.A (FII.PA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDR.MC achieves a 12.07% return, which is significantly lower than FII.PA's 22.95% return. Over the past 10 years, IDR.MC has outperformed FII.PA with an annualized return of 19.36%, while FII.PA has yielded a comparatively lower 11.89% annualized return.


IDR.MC

1D
1.45%
1M
7.72%
YTD
12.07%
6M
11.80%
1Y
56.31%
3Y*
69.82%
5Y*
51.82%
10Y*
19.36%

FII.PA

1D
0.93%
1M
-0.92%
YTD
22.95%
6M
28.27%
1Y
97.54%
3Y*
39.23%
5Y*
18.66%
10Y*
11.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDR.MC vs. FII.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IDR.MC
Indra A
12.07%186.12%23.62%34.32%13.68%36.39%-31.43%23.62%-27.79%9.56%
FII.PA
Lisi S.A
22.95%144.84%-5.60%22.00%-30.35%41.43%-30.82%48.75%-48.06%32.50%

Correlation

The correlation between IDR.MC and FII.PA is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 1997

0.16

The correlation between IDR.MC and FII.PA shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (all time) to 0.31 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDR.MC vs. FII.PA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDR.MC
IDR.MC Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
IDR.MC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDR.MC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDR.MC Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
IDR.MC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDR.MC Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

FII.PA
FII.PA Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FII.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FII.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
FII.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
FII.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FII.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDR.MC vs. FII.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Indra A (IDR.MC) and Lisi S.A (FII.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IDR.MCFII.PADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.36

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

4.02

-2.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.74

11.98

-7.25

IDR.MC vs. FII.PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDR.MC Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is lower than the FII.PA Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDR.MC and FII.PA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IDR.MCFII.PADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.18

2.25

-1.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.45

0.54

+0.91

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.30

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.43

-0.07

Drawdowns

IDR.MC vs. FII.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDR.MC drawdown since its inception was -68.69%, smaller than the maximum FII.PA drawdown of -78.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDR.MC and FII.PA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDR.MCFII.PADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.69%

-78.16%

+9.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.23%

-22.99%

-7.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.23%

-28.50%

-1.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.68%

-41.75%

+11.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.01%

-70.02%

+7.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.66%

-7.03%

-8.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.34%

-30.28%

+1.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.04%

7.68%

+4.36%

Volatility

IDR.MC vs. FII.PA - Volatility Comparison

Indra A (IDR.MC) has a higher volatility of 10.99% compared to Lisi S.A (FII.PA) at 8.46%. This indicates that IDR.MC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FII.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDR.MCFII.PADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.99%

8.46%

+2.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.66%

29.56%

+10.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

48.25%

41.17%

+7.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.17%

34.03%

+1.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.50%

38.47%

-3.97%

Dividends

IDR.MC vs. FII.PA - Dividend Comparison

IDR.MC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than FII.PA's 0.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FII.PA
Lisi S.A
0.71%0.73%1.41%0.64%1.49%0.49%2.28%1.46%2.34%1.12%1.27%1.48%
IDR.MC
Indra A
0.46%0.52%1.46%1.79%1.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

IDR.MC vs. FII.PA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Indra A and Lisi S.A. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in EUR except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


IDR.MC and FII.PA have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDR.MC and FII.PA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer