ICSU.L vs. MVUS.L
ICSU.L (iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and MVUS.L (iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - ICSU.L is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Consumer Staples Index, while MVUS.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ICSU.L returned 8.44%/yr vs 9.95%/yr for MVUS.L. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ICSU.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for MVUS.L.
Performance
ICSU.L vs. MVUS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICSU.L achieves a 8.55% return, which is significantly higher than MVUS.L's 4.03% return.
ICSU.L
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -0.51%
- YTD
- 8.55%
- 6M
- 8.42%
- 1Y
- 6.30%
- 3Y*
- 6.78%
- 5Y*
- 8.44%
- 10Y*
- —
MVUS.L
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- 4.47%
- YTD
- 4.03%
- 6M
- 4.68%
- 1Y
- 11.77%
- 3Y*
- 11.21%
- 5Y*
- 9.95%
- 10Y*
- 11.19%
ICSU.L vs. MVUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICSU.L iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 8.55% | -3.20% | 16.26% | -5.83% | 11.78% | 19.63% | 5.64% | 22.78% | -4.77% | -20.91% |
MVUS.L iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 4.03% | 3.88% | 20.71% | 3.83% | -0.36% | 26.59% | 3.87% | 26.86% | -0.36% | 4.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between ICSU.L and MVUS.L is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2017 | 0.67 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ICSU.L and MVUS.L has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
ICSU.L vs. MVUS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ICSU.L
MVUS.L
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
ICSU.L
MVUS.L
Consumer Cyclical
ICSU.L
MVUS.L
Basic Materials
ICSU.L
-
MVUS.L
Communication Services
ICSU.L
-
MVUS.L
Energy
ICSU.L
-
MVUS.L
Financial Services
ICSU.L
-
MVUS.L
Healthcare
ICSU.L
-
MVUS.L
Industrials
ICSU.L
-
MVUS.L
Real Estate
ICSU.L
-
MVUS.L
Technology
ICSU.L
-
MVUS.L
Utilities
ICSU.L
-
MVUS.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ICSU.L vs. MVUS.L — Risk / Return Rank
ICSU.L
MVUS.L
ICSU.L vs. MVUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ICSU.L) and iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (MVUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ICSU.L | MVUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.26 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.68 | 2.18 | -1.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.61 | 6.82 | -5.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ICSU.L | MVUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 | 1.46 | -1.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.54 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.49 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
ICSU.L vs. MVUS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICSU.L drawdown since its inception was -33.13%, smaller than the maximum MVUS.L drawdown of -39.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICSU.L and MVUS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICSU.L | MVUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.13% | -39.22% | +6.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.24% | -5.39% | -3.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.55% | -20.40% | -0.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.55% | -20.40% | -0.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.70% | -0.44% | -5.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.36% | -7.21% | -3.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.90% | 1.72% | +2.18% |
Volatility
ICSU.L vs. MVUS.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ICSU.L) has a higher volatility of 6.88% compared to iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (MVUS.L) at 2.34%. This indicates that ICSU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MVUS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ICSU.L | MVUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.88% | 2.34% | +4.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.08% | 5.60% | +6.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.44% | 8.05% | +6.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.17% | 18.31% | +0.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.66% | 16.99% | +1.67% |
ICSU.L vs. MVUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICSU.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than MVUS.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ICSU.L vs. MVUS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ICSU.L nor MVUS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ICSU.L and MVUS.L have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ICSU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ICSU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for MVUS.L.
ICSU.L is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while MVUS.L is S&P 500. ICSU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Consumer Staples Index, while MVUS.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for ICSU.L and 0.20% for MVUS.L.
Find the right allocation for ICSU.L and MVUS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer