ICSH vs. SCHP
ICSH (iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF) and SCHP (Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ICSH is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by iShares, while SCHP is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L). ICSH is actively managed, while SCHP is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ICSH returned 2.77%/yr vs 2.53%/yr for SCHP. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ICSH charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHP.
Performance
ICSH vs. SCHP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICSH achieves a 1.43% return, which is significantly higher than SCHP's 0.96% return. Over the past 10 years, ICSH has outperformed SCHP with an annualized return of 2.77%, while SCHP has yielded a comparatively lower 2.53% annualized return.
ICSH
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- YTD
- 1.43%
- 6M
- 1.75%
- 1Y
- 4.30%
- 3Y*
- 5.15%
- 5Y*
- 3.67%
- 10Y*
- 2.77%
SCHP
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -0.89%
- YTD
- 0.96%
- 6M
- 0.95%
- 1Y
- 4.80%
- 3Y*
- 3.84%
- 5Y*
- 1.02%
- 10Y*
- 2.53%
ICSH vs. SCHP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICSH iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF | 1.43% | 4.96% | 5.52% | 5.58% | 0.97% | 0.16% | 1.61% | 3.17% | 2.25% | 1.63% |
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 0.96% | 6.76% | 1.95% | 3.91% | -12.02% | 5.87% | 10.86% | 8.52% | -1.78% | 3.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between ICSH and SCHP is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2013 | 0.17 |
Over the past year, ICSH and SCHP have become more correlated (0.41) than their long-term average of 0.17, meaning their price movements have been converging.
ICSH vs. SCHP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ICSH
SCHP
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
ICSH
SCHP
-
Basic Materials
ICSH
-
SCHP
-
Communication Services
ICSH
-
SCHP
-
Consumer Cyclical
ICSH
-
SCHP
Consumer Defensive
ICSH
-
SCHP
-
Energy
ICSH
-
SCHP
-
Financial Services
ICSH
-
SCHP
Healthcare
ICSH
-
SCHP
-
Industrials
ICSH
-
SCHP
-
Real Estate
ICSH
-
SCHP
-
Technology
ICSH
-
SCHP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ICSH vs. SCHP — Risk / Return Rank
ICSH
SCHP
ICSH vs. SCHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF (ICSH) and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ICSH | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +9.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +25.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 6.56 | 1.26 | +5.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 43.67 | 2.50 | +41.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 288.81 | 7.59 | +281.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ICSH | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.01 | 1.47 | +9.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 7.62 | 0.17 | +7.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 2.63 | 0.45 | +2.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.93 | 0.50 | +1.43 |
Drawdowns
ICSH vs. SCHP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICSH drawdown since its inception was -3.94%, smaller than the maximum SCHP drawdown of -14.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICSH and SCHP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICSH | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.94% | -14.26% | +10.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.10% | -1.93% | +1.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.10% | -4.48% | +4.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.73% | -14.26% | +13.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -3.94% | -14.26% | +10.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.02% | -0.89% | +0.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.08% | -3.93% | +3.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.01% | 0.63% | -0.62% |
Volatility
ICSH vs. SCHP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF (ICSH) is 0.15%, while Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) has a volatility of 1.00%. This indicates that ICSH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ICSH | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.15% | 1.00% | -0.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.30% | 2.24% | -1.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39% | 3.29% | -2.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.48% | 6.12% | -5.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.06% | 5.59% | -4.53% |
ICSH vs. SCHP - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICSH has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHP's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ICSH vs. SCHP - Dividend Comparison
ICSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.34%, more than SCHP's 4.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICSH iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF | 4.34% | 4.55% | 5.24% | 4.78% | 1.66% | 0.42% | 1.21% | 2.61% | 2.20% | 1.36% | 0.88% | 0.54% |
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 4.01% | 4.06% | 2.99% | 3.02% | 7.19% | 4.39% | 1.11% | 2.02% | 2.26% | 1.90% | 1.38% | 0.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ICSH and SCHP have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHP has higher volatility (1.00%) compared to ICSH (0.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICSH dropped -3.94% vs SCHP's -14.26%.
On 10-year performance, ICSH leads with 2.77% vs 2.53% for SCHP. On fees, SCHP is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ICSH has been the lower-risk option at 0.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ICSH has performed better with a 2.77% return vs 2.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHP is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for ICSH.
ICSH has the higher dividend yield at 4.34%, compared with 4.01% for SCHP.
ICSH is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while SCHP is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for ICSH and 0.03% for SCHP.
ICSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.01 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ICSH and SCHP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer