ICSH vs. QYLD

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

ICSH (iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF) and QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ICSH is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by iShares, while QYLD is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. ICSH is actively managed, while QYLD is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ICSH returned 2.77%/yr vs 9.77%/yr for QYLD. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ICSH charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QYLD.

Performance

ICSH vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF (ICSH) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICSH achieves a 1.43% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's 7.05% return. Over the past 10 years, ICSH has underperformed QYLD with an annualized return of 2.77%, while QYLD has yielded a comparatively higher 9.77% annualized return.

ICSH

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.18%
• YTD: 1.43%
• 6M: 1.75%
• 1Y: 4.30%
• 3Y*: 5.15%
• 5Y*: 3.67%
• 10Y*: 2.77%

QYLD

• 1D: 1.07%
• 1M: 0.23%
• YTD: 7.05%
• 6M: 8.87%
• 1Y: 22.45%
• 3Y*: 13.42%
• 5Y*: 8.24%
• 10Y*: 9.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICSH vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ICSH iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF	1.43%	4.96%	5.52%	5.58%	0.97%	0.16%	1.61%	3.17%	2.25%	1.63%
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	7.05%	9.28%	19.35%	22.77%	-19.08%	10.41%	8.72%	22.69%	-3.07%	18.79%

Correlation

The correlation between ICSH and QYLD is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.07
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.09
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2013	0.06

The correlation between ICSH and QYLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (10 years) to 0.16 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ICSH vs. QYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ICSH	QYLD
Utilities	100.0%	1.4%
Basic Materials	-	1.1%
Communication Services	-	15.8%
Consumer Cyclical	-	12.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	7.7%
Energy	-	0.6%
Financial Services	-	0.2%
Healthcare	-	4.2%
Industrials	-	2.8%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Technology	-	53.8%

Return for Risk

ICSH vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICSH

ICSH Risk / Return Rank: 99
ICSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
ICSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
ICSH Omega Ratio Rank: 99
ICSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
ICSH Martin Ratio Rank: 99

QYLD

QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 89
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 92
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICSH vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF (ICSH) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ICSH	QYLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	11.01	2.56	+8.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	27.36	3.53	+23.83
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	6.56	1.57	+4.99
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	43.67	4.54	+39.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	288.81	26.31	+262.50
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ICSH vs. QYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICSH Sharpe Ratio is 11.01, which is higher than the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICSH and QYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ICSH	QYLD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.01	2.56	+8.45
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	7.62	0.56	+7.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	2.63	0.63	+2.00
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.93	0.59	+1.35

Drawdowns

ICSH vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICSH drawdown since its inception was -3.94%, smaller than the maximum QYLD drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICSH and QYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	ICSH	QYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.94%	-24.75%	+20.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.10%	-4.97%	+4.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.10%	-19.06%	+18.96%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-0.73%	-24.61%	+23.88%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-3.94%	-24.75%	+20.81%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.02%	-0.83%	+0.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.08%	-3.83%	+3.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.01%	0.86%	-0.85%

Volatility

ICSH vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF (ICSH) is 0.15%, while Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) has a volatility of 2.86%. This indicates that ICSH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ICSH	QYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.15%	2.86%	-2.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.30%	7.44%	-7.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39%	8.84%	-8.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.48%	14.73%	-14.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.06%	15.51%	-14.45%

ICSH vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICSH has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

ICSH vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

ICSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.34%, less than QYLD's 11.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ICSH iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF	4.34%	4.55%	5.24%	4.78%	1.66%	0.42%	1.21%	2.61%	2.20%	1.36%	0.88%	0.54%
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	11.55%	11.55%	12.50%	11.78%	13.75%	12.85%	11.16%	9.84%	12.44%	7.69%	9.15%	9.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ICSH and QYLD in my portfolio?

ICSH and QYLD have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ICSH or QYLD?

QYLD has higher volatility (2.86%) compared to ICSH (0.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICSH dropped -3.94% vs QYLD's -24.75%.

Which ETF is better, ICSH or QYLD?

On 10-year performance, QYLD leads with 9.77% vs 2.77% for ICSH. On fees, ICSH is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, ICSH has been the lower-risk option at 0.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ICSH or QYLD?

Over the 10-year period, QYLD has performed better with a 9.77% return vs 2.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ICSH or QYLD?

ICSH is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QYLD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ICSH or QYLD?

QYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.55%, compared with 4.34% for ICSH.

What is the main difference between ICSH and QYLD?

ICSH is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for ICSH and 0.60% for QYLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ICSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.01 vs 2.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.