PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBTM.L vs. UUP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBTM.L vs. UUP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBTM.L) and Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IBTM.L is traded in GBP, while UUP is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the UUP values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBTM.L achieves a -0.45% return, which is significantly lower than UUP's 4.71% return. Over the past 10 years, IBTM.L has underperformed UUP with an annualized return of 1.38%, while UUP has yielded a comparatively higher 3.88% annualized return.


IBTM.L

1D
0.18%
1M
1.03%
YTD
-0.45%
6M
-0.81%
1Y
5.41%
3Y*
0.62%
5Y*
-0.02%
10Y*
1.38%

UUP

1D
0.00%
1M
4.74%
YTD
4.71%
6M
2.91%
1Y
7.09%
3Y*
2.17%
5Y*
7.24%
10Y*
3.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBTM.L vs. UUP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IBTM.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Dist)
-0.45%0.89%1.46%-2.26%-4.74%-1.77%6.02%5.50%6.50%-6.47%
UUP
Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund
4.71%-11.76%15.49%-1.55%22.47%6.74%-9.40%0.13%13.40%-16.96%

Correlation

The correlation between IBTM.L and UUP is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2007

0.52

The correlation between IBTM.L and UUP shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (3 years) to 0.54 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBTM.L vs. UUP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBTM.L
IBTM.L Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
IBTM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBTM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBTM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
IBTM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBTM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

UUP
UUP Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
UUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
UUP Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
UUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
UUP Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBTM.L vs. UUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBTM.L) and Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBTM.LUUPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.10

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.97

0.78

+0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.30

2.03

+0.26

IBTM.L vs. UUP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBTM.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is higher than the UUP Sharpe Ratio of 0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBTM.L and UUP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBTM.LUUPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

0.58

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

0.48

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

0.25

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.03

0.24

-0.21

Drawdowns

IBTM.L vs. UUP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBTM.L drawdown since its inception was -52.39%, which is greater than UUP's maximum drawdown of -36.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTM.L and UUP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBTM.LUUPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.39%

-36.14%

-16.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.57%

-9.12%

+3.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.57%

-20.10%

+12.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.29%

-26.19%

+9.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.54%

-30.58%

+4.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.39%

-15.09%

-6.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.63%

-17.50%

-3.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.35%

3.50%

-1.15%

Volatility

IBTM.L vs. UUP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBTM.L) is 1.59%, while Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP) has a volatility of 2.91%. This indicates that IBTM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UUP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBTM.LUUPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.59%

2.91%

-1.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.47%

8.88%

-4.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.26%

12.22%

-5.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.47%

15.12%

-5.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.59%

15.39%

-4.80%

IBTM.L vs. UUP - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBTM.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than UUP's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

IBTM.L vs. UUP - Dividend Comparison

IBTM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, more than UUP's 3.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBTM.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Dist)
4.36%4.19%3.94%3.16%1.96%1.14%1.69%2.53%2.34%2.02%1.79%1.97%
UUP
Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund
3.31%3.43%4.48%6.44%0.89%0.00%0.00%2.03%1.08%0.10%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBTM.L and UUP have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IBTM.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBTM.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UUP.

IBTM.L is categorized as Government Bonds, while UUP is Currency. IBTM.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 7-10 Year Bond Index, while UUP tracks Deutsche Bank Long US Dollar Index (USDX) Futures Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBTM.L and 0.75% for UUP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBTM.L and UUP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer