PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBTM.L vs. SPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBTM.L vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBTM.L) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IBTM.L is traded in GBP, while SPY is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPY values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBTM.L achieves a -0.45% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 9.54% return. Over the past 10 years, IBTM.L has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 1.38%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 16.02% annualized return.


IBTM.L

1D
0.18%
1M
1.03%
YTD
-0.45%
6M
-0.81%
1Y
5.41%
3Y*
0.62%
5Y*
-0.02%
10Y*
1.38%

SPY

1D
0.00%
1M
2.19%
YTD
9.54%
6M
8.36%
1Y
26.26%
3Y*
18.89%
5Y*
14.66%
10Y*
16.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBTM.L vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IBTM.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Dist)
-0.45%0.89%1.46%-2.26%-4.74%-1.77%6.02%5.50%6.50%-6.47%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
9.76%9.33%27.07%19.87%-8.45%29.95%14.86%26.23%1.09%11.18%

Correlation

The correlation between IBTM.L and SPY is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2007

0.09

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBTM.L vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBTM.L
IBTM.L Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
IBTM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBTM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBTM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
IBTM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBTM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

SPY
SPY Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
SPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBTM.L vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBTM.L) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBTM.LSPYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.43

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.97

3.43

-2.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.30

13.08

-10.78

IBTM.L vs. SPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBTM.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is lower than the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBTM.L and SPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBTM.LSPYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

2.28

-1.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

0.92

-0.92

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

0.89

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.03

0.68

-0.65

Drawdowns

IBTM.L vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBTM.L drawdown since its inception was -52.39%, which is greater than SPY's maximum drawdown of -34.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTM.L and SPY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBTM.LSPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.39%

-34.68%

-17.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.57%

-7.69%

+2.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.57%

-21.94%

+14.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.29%

-21.94%

+5.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.54%

-25.78%

-0.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.39%

-1.97%

-19.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.63%

-4.78%

-15.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.35%

2.01%

+0.34%

Volatility

IBTM.L vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBTM.L) is 1.59%, while State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) has a volatility of 3.28%. This indicates that IBTM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBTM.LSPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.59%

3.28%

-1.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.47%

8.37%

-3.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.26%

11.58%

-5.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.47%

16.04%

-6.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.59%

18.03%

-7.44%

IBTM.L vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBTM.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBTM.L vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

IBTM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, more than SPY's 1.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBTM.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Dist)
4.36%4.19%3.94%3.16%1.96%1.14%1.69%2.53%2.34%2.02%1.79%1.97%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
1.00%1.07%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBTM.L and SPY have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IBTM.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBTM.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for SPY.

IBTM.L is categorized as Government Bonds, while SPY is S&P 500. IBTM.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 7-10 Year Bond Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBTM.L and 0.09% for SPY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBTM.L and SPY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer