IBIT vs. URA
IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) and URA (Global X Uranium ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant, while URA is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IBIT returned -39.44% vs 43.02% for URA. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IBIT charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for URA.
Performance
IBIT vs. URA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBIT achieves a -27.71% return, which is significantly lower than URA's 7.47% return.
IBIT
- 1D
- 5.13%
- 1M
- -21.03%
- YTD
- -27.71%
- 6M
- -30.34%
- 1Y
- -39.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
URA
- 1D
- 1.35%
- 1M
- -16.78%
- YTD
- 7.47%
- 6M
- 0.63%
- 1Y
- 43.02%
- 3Y*
- 33.80%
- 5Y*
- 19.23%
- 10Y*
- 15.57%
IBIT vs. URA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | -27.71% | -6.41% | 89.87% |
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 7.47% | 67.18% | -4.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBIT and URA is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBIT vs. URA — Risk / Return Rank
IBIT
URA
IBIT vs. URA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBIT | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.17 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.76 | 1.52 | -2.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.36 | 3.16 | -4.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBIT | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.90 | 0.85 | -1.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.44 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | -0.07 | +0.33 |
Drawdowns
IBIT vs. URA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBIT drawdown since its inception was -52.11%, smaller than the maximum URA drawdown of -93.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBIT and URA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBIT | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.11% | -93.54% | +41.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.11% | -28.43% | -23.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -37.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.66% | -47.89% | -1.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.19% | -74.99% | +58.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.97% | 13.66% | +15.31% |
Volatility
IBIT vs. URA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) is 11.85%, while Global X Uranium ETF (URA) has a volatility of 16.85%. This indicates that IBIT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBIT | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.85% | 16.85% | -5.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.60% | 39.19% | -4.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.28% | 51.23% | -6.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.32% | 43.83% | +6.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.32% | 37.84% | +12.48% |
IBIT vs. URA - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBIT has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than URA's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBIT vs. URA - Dividend Comparison
IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while URA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 4.54% | 4.88% | 2.86% | 6.07% | 0.76% | 5.84% | 1.69% | 1.66% | 0.44% | 2.03% | 7.28% | 1.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBIT and URA have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
URA has higher volatility (16.85%) compared to IBIT (11.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBIT dropped -52.11% vs URA's -93.54%.
On 1-year performance, URA leads with 43.02% vs -39.44% for IBIT. On fees, IBIT is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IBIT has been the lower-risk option at 11.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, URA has performed better with a 43.02% return vs -39.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBIT is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for URA.
URA has the higher dividend yield at 4.54%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.
IBIT is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while URA is Commodity Producers Equities. IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant, while URA tracks Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IBIT and 0.69% for URA.
URA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.85 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBIT and URA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer