PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBIT vs. UIFS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBIT vs. UIFS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) and iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (UIFS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IBIT is traded in USD, while UIFS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the UIFS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBIT achieves a -27.71% return, which is significantly lower than UIFS.L's -4.88% return.


IBIT

1D
5.13%
1M
-21.03%
YTD
-27.71%
6M
-30.34%
1Y
-39.44%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

UIFS.L

1D
0.10%
1M
1.79%
YTD
-4.88%
6M
-1.59%
1Y
3.35%
3Y*
17.97%
5Y*
8.14%
10Y*
12.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBIT vs. UIFS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
-27.71%-6.41%89.87%
UIFS.L
iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
-4.88%15.15%30.07%

Correlation

The correlation between IBIT and UIFS.L is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024

0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBIT vs. UIFS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBIT
IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

UIFS.L
UIFS.L Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
UIFS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UIFS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
UIFS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
UIFS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
UIFS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBIT vs. UIFS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) and iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (UIFS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBITUIFS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.86

1.05

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.76

0.23

-0.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.36

0.59

-1.95

IBIT vs. UIFS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBIT Sharpe Ratio is -0.90, which is lower than the UIFS.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBIT and UIFS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBITUIFS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.90

0.24

-1.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.27

-0.01

Drawdowns

IBIT vs. UIFS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBIT drawdown since its inception was -52.11%, which is greater than UIFS.L's maximum drawdown of -47.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBIT and UIFS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBITUIFS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.11%

-47.09%

-5.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.11%

-14.24%

-37.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.66%

-6.87%

-42.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.19%

-12.63%

-3.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.97%

5.67%

+23.30%

Volatility

IBIT vs. UIFS.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a higher volatility of 11.85% compared to iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (UIFS.L) at 4.24%. This indicates that IBIT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UIFS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBITUIFS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.85%

4.24%

+7.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.60%

10.76%

+23.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.28%

14.19%

+30.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.32%

23.31%

+27.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.32%

23.10%

+27.22%

IBIT vs. UIFS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBIT has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than UIFS.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBIT vs. UIFS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IBIT nor UIFS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IBIT and UIFS.L have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UIFS.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UIFS.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IBIT.

IBIT is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while UIFS.L is Financials Equities. IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant, while UIFS.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Financials Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IBIT and 0.15% for UIFS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBIT and UIFS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer