IBIT vs. NLR
IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) and NLR (VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant, while NLR is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IBIT returned -39.44% vs 26.72% for NLR. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IBIT charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for NLR.
Performance
IBIT vs. NLR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBIT achieves a -27.71% return, which is significantly lower than NLR's -0.79% return.
IBIT
- 1D
- 5.13%
- 1M
- -21.03%
- YTD
- -27.71%
- 6M
- -30.34%
- 1Y
- -39.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NLR
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- -12.54%
- YTD
- -0.79%
- 6M
- -6.08%
- 1Y
- 26.72%
- 3Y*
- 31.16%
- 5Y*
- 20.16%
- 10Y*
- 12.72%
IBIT vs. NLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | -27.71% | -6.41% | 89.87% |
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF | -0.79% | 56.50% | 10.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBIT and NLR is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBIT vs. NLR — Risk / Return Rank
IBIT
NLR
IBIT vs. NLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBIT | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.13 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.76 | 1.04 | -1.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.36 | 2.08 | -3.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBIT | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.90 | 0.63 | -1.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.16 | +0.10 |
Drawdowns
IBIT vs. NLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBIT drawdown since its inception was -52.11%, smaller than the maximum NLR drawdown of -65.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBIT and NLR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBIT | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.11% | -65.05% | +12.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.11% | -25.80% | -26.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -30.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.66% | -25.03% | -24.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.19% | -35.71% | +19.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.97% | 12.87% | +16.10% |
Volatility
IBIT vs. NLR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) is 11.85%, while VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) has a volatility of 13.36%. This indicates that IBIT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBIT | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.85% | 13.36% | -1.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.60% | 33.24% | +1.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.28% | 42.96% | +1.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.32% | 29.43% | +20.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.32% | 24.14% | +26.18% |
IBIT vs. NLR - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBIT has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than NLR's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBIT vs. NLR - Dividend Comparison
IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF | 2.57% | 2.55% | 0.76% | 4.54% | 2.02% | 1.99% | 2.23% | 2.21% | 3.91% | 4.86% | 3.62% | 3.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBIT and NLR have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NLR has higher volatility (13.36%) compared to IBIT (11.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBIT dropped -52.11% vs NLR's -65.05%.
On 1-year performance, NLR leads with 26.72% vs -39.44% for IBIT. On fees, IBIT is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IBIT has been the lower-risk option at 11.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NLR has performed better with a 26.72% return vs -39.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBIT is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for NLR.
NLR has the higher dividend yield at 2.57%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.
IBIT is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while NLR is Alternative Energy Equities. IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant, while NLR tracks MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IBIT and 0.56% for NLR.
NLR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.63 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBIT and NLR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer