PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBIT vs. FETH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBIT vs. FETH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) and Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBIT achieves a -27.71% return, which is significantly higher than FETH's -43.33% return.


IBIT

1D
5.13%
1M
-21.03%
YTD
-27.71%
6M
-30.34%
1Y
-39.44%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FETH

1D
6.91%
1M
-27.30%
YTD
-43.33%
6M
-46.42%
1Y
-32.42%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBIT vs. FETH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
-27.71%-6.41%36.27%
FETH
Fidelity Ethereum Fund
-43.33%-11.37%-4.68%

Correlation

The correlation between IBIT and FETH is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2024

0.81

The correlation between IBIT and FETH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBIT vs. FETH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBIT
IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

FETH
FETH Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
FETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
FETH Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
FETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
FETH Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBIT vs. FETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) and Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBITFETHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.86

0.97

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.76

-0.48

-0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.36

-0.84

-0.52

IBIT vs. FETH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBIT Sharpe Ratio is -0.90, which is lower than the FETH Sharpe Ratio of -0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBIT and FETH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBITFETHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.90

-0.47

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

-0.44

+0.71

Drawdowns

IBIT vs. FETH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBIT drawdown since its inception was -52.11%, smaller than the maximum FETH drawdown of -67.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBIT and FETH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBITFETHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.11%

-67.57%

+15.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.11%

-67.57%

+15.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.66%

-65.33%

+15.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.19%

-32.93%

+16.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.97%

38.48%

-9.51%

Volatility

IBIT vs. FETH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) is 11.85%, while Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH) has a volatility of 16.74%. This indicates that IBIT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FETH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBITFETHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.85%

16.74%

-4.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.60%

46.94%

-12.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.28%

69.70%

-25.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.32%

72.70%

-22.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.32%

72.70%

-22.38%

IBIT vs. FETH - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IBIT and FETH have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBIT vs. FETH - Dividend Comparison

Neither IBIT nor FETH has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IBIT and FETH have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FETH has higher volatility (16.74%) compared to IBIT (11.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBIT dropped -52.11% vs FETH's -67.57%.

On 1-year performance, FETH leads with -32.42% vs -39.44% for IBIT. Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. On volatility, IBIT has been the lower-risk option at 11.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FETH has performed better with a -32.42% return vs -39.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBIT and FETH have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

IBIT and FETH have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant, while FETH tracks Fidelity Ethereum Reference Rate Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fidelity.

FETH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.47 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBIT and FETH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer