IBIT vs. FETH
IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) and FETH (Fidelity Ethereum Fund) are both Cryptocurrency funds - IBIT tracks the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant while FETH tracks the Fidelity Ethereum Reference Rate Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IBIT returned -39.44% vs -32.42% for FETH. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.
Performance
IBIT vs. FETH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBIT achieves a -27.71% return, which is significantly higher than FETH's -43.33% return.
IBIT
- 1D
- 5.13%
- 1M
- -21.03%
- YTD
- -27.71%
- 6M
- -30.34%
- 1Y
- -39.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FETH
- 1D
- 6.91%
- 1M
- -27.30%
- YTD
- -43.33%
- 6M
- -46.42%
- 1Y
- -32.42%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBIT vs. FETH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | -27.71% | -6.41% | 36.27% |
FETH Fidelity Ethereum Fund | -43.33% | -11.37% | -4.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBIT and FETH is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2024 | 0.81 |
The correlation between IBIT and FETH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBIT vs. FETH — Risk / Return Rank
IBIT
FETH
IBIT vs. FETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) and Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBIT | FETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 0.97 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.76 | -0.48 | -0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.36 | -0.84 | -0.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBIT | FETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.90 | -0.47 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | -0.44 | +0.71 |
Drawdowns
IBIT vs. FETH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBIT drawdown since its inception was -52.11%, smaller than the maximum FETH drawdown of -67.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBIT and FETH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBIT | FETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.11% | -67.57% | +15.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.11% | -67.57% | +15.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.66% | -65.33% | +15.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.19% | -32.93% | +16.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.97% | 38.48% | -9.51% |
Volatility
IBIT vs. FETH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) is 11.85%, while Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH) has a volatility of 16.74%. This indicates that IBIT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FETH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBIT | FETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.85% | 16.74% | -4.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.60% | 46.94% | -12.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.28% | 69.70% | -25.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.32% | 72.70% | -22.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.32% | 72.70% | -22.38% |
IBIT vs. FETH - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IBIT and FETH have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBIT vs. FETH - Dividend Comparison
Neither IBIT nor FETH has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IBIT and FETH have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FETH has higher volatility (16.74%) compared to IBIT (11.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBIT dropped -52.11% vs FETH's -67.57%.
On 1-year performance, FETH leads with -32.42% vs -39.44% for IBIT. Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. On volatility, IBIT has been the lower-risk option at 11.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FETH has performed better with a -32.42% return vs -39.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBIT and FETH have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.
IBIT and FETH have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant, while FETH tracks Fidelity Ethereum Reference Rate Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fidelity.
FETH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.47 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBIT and FETH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer