PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IAUP.L vs. XDWU.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IAUP.L vs. XDWU.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF USD Acc (IAUP.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF 1C (XDWU.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IAUP.L is traded in USD, while XDWU.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the XDWU.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IAUP.L achieves a -5.97% return, which is significantly lower than XDWU.DE's 4.68% return. Over the past 10 years, IAUP.L has outperformed XDWU.DE with an annualized return of 13.00%, while XDWU.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 8.56% annualized return.


IAUP.L

1D
-0.83%
1M
-14.34%
YTD
-5.97%
6M
0.57%
1Y
53.86%
3Y*
39.07%
5Y*
17.21%
10Y*
13.00%

XDWU.DE

1D
-1.38%
1M
-3.51%
YTD
4.68%
6M
5.50%
1Y
15.85%
3Y*
14.75%
5Y*
8.84%
10Y*
8.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IAUP.L vs. XDWU.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IAUP.L
iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF USD Acc
-5.97%153.99%11.49%9.43%-11.06%-10.31%23.60%45.60%-9.55%6.68%
XDWU.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF 1C
4.68%25.74%12.97%-0.13%-3.41%10.35%4.42%22.62%1.76%13.90%

Correlation

The correlation between IAUP.L and XDWU.DE is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2016

0.26

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IAUP.L vs. XDWU.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IAUP.L
IAUP.L Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
IAUP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAUP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAUP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
IAUP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAUP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

XDWU.DE
XDWU.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
XDWU.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDWU.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDWU.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
XDWU.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDWU.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IAUP.L vs. XDWU.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF USD Acc (IAUP.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF 1C (XDWU.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IAUP.LXDWU.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.21

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.80

1.87

-0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.67

5.38

-0.71

IAUP.L vs. XDWU.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IAUP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is comparable to the XDWU.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IAUP.L and XDWU.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IAUP.LXDWU.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.22

1.17

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.57

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

0.53

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.07

0.54

-0.47

Drawdowns

IAUP.L vs. XDWU.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IAUP.L drawdown since its inception was -79.88%, which is greater than XDWU.DE's maximum drawdown of -34.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAUP.L and XDWU.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IAUP.LXDWU.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.88%

-34.09%

-45.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.72%

-7.92%

-21.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.72%

-17.46%

-12.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.90%

-21.79%

-23.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.26%

-34.09%

-17.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.72%

-7.92%

-21.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-48.71%

-5.04%

-43.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.50%

2.76%

+8.74%

Volatility

IAUP.L vs. XDWU.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF USD Acc (IAUP.L) has a higher volatility of 14.40% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF 1C (XDWU.DE) at 4.17%. This indicates that IAUP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDWU.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IAUP.LXDWU.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.40%

4.17%

+10.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.45%

10.41%

+25.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.96%

12.60%

+31.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.45%

15.38%

+20.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.61%

15.94%

+18.67%

IAUP.L vs. XDWU.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IAUP.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than XDWU.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

IAUP.L vs. XDWU.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither IAUP.L nor XDWU.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IAUP.L and XDWU.DE have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDWU.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDWU.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for IAUP.L.

IAUP.L is categorized as Gold, while XDWU.DE is Utilities Equities. IAUP.L tracks S&P Commodity Producers Gold Index, while XDWU.DE tracks MSCI World/Utilities NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for IAUP.L and 0.25% for XDWU.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IAUP.L and XDWU.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer