PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IAU vs. VOOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IAU vs. VOOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Gold Trust (IAU) and Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IAU achieves a 0.26% return, which is significantly lower than VOOG's 10.10% return. Over the past 10 years, IAU has underperformed VOOG with an annualized return of 12.71%, while VOOG has yielded a comparatively higher 17.80% annualized return.


IAU

1D
0.20%
1M
-8.43%
YTD
0.26%
6M
3.08%
1Y
30.27%
3Y*
29.88%
5Y*
17.71%
10Y*
12.71%

VOOG

1D
0.65%
1M
-0.20%
YTD
10.10%
6M
9.55%
1Y
29.06%
3Y*
26.66%
5Y*
15.20%
10Y*
17.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IAU vs. VOOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IAU
iShares Gold Trust
0.26%63.95%26.85%12.84%-0.63%-4.00%25.03%17.98%-1.76%12.91%
VOOG
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF
10.10%22.11%35.89%29.96%-29.48%31.95%33.35%30.93%-0.21%27.19%

Correlation

The correlation between IAU and VOOG is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010

0.05

The correlation between IAU and VOOG shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (all time) to 0.19 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IAU vs. VOOG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IAU
VOOG

Real Estate

100.0%
0.6%

Basic Materials

-

0.4%

Communication Services

-

18.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

1.0%

Energy

-

0.1%

Financial Services

-

8.8%

Healthcare

-

5.8%

Industrials

-

6.2%

Technology

-

49.4%

Utilities

-

0.4%

Real Estate

IAU
100.0%
VOOG
0.6%

Basic Materials

IAU

-

VOOG
0.4%

Communication Services

IAU

-

VOOG
18.0%

Consumer Cyclical

IAU

-

VOOG
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

IAU

-

VOOG
1.0%

Energy

IAU

-

VOOG
0.1%

Financial Services

IAU

-

VOOG
8.8%

Healthcare

IAU

-

VOOG
5.8%

Industrials

IAU

-

VOOG
6.2%

Technology

IAU

-

VOOG
49.4%

Utilities

IAU

-

VOOG
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IAU vs. VOOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IAU
IAU Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
IAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAU Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
IAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAU Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

VOOG
VOOG Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
VOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
VOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IAU vs. VOOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Gold Trust (IAU) and Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IAUVOOGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.31

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

2.13

-0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.80

8.74

-4.94

IAU vs. VOOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IAU Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is lower than the VOOG Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IAU and VOOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IAUVOOGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.14

1.79

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

0.72

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.86

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.89

-0.28

Drawdowns

IAU vs. VOOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IAU drawdown since its inception was -45.14%, which is greater than VOOG's maximum drawdown of -32.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAU and VOOG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IAUVOOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.14%

-32.73%

-12.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.04%

-13.71%

-6.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.04%

-22.18%

+2.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.93%

-32.73%

+11.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.82%

-32.73%

+10.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.88%

-4.28%

-15.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.97%

-4.97%

-11.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.99%

3.33%

+4.66%

Volatility

IAU vs. VOOG - Volatility Comparison

iShares Gold Trust (IAU) and Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) have volatilities of 5.64% and 5.61%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IAUVOOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.64%

5.61%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.33%

13.04%

+10.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.68%

16.31%

+10.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.02%

21.25%

-3.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.94%

20.77%

-4.83%

IAU vs. VOOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

IAU has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VOOG's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IAU vs. VOOG - Dividend Comparison

IAU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IAU
iShares Gold Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOOG
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.45%0.49%0.49%1.12%0.93%0.53%0.88%1.26%1.34%1.32%1.47%1.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


IAU and VOOG have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IAU has higher volatility (5.64%) compared to VOOG (5.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IAU dropped -45.14% vs VOOG's -32.73%.

On 10-year performance, VOOG leads with 17.80% vs 12.71% for IAU. On fees, VOOG is cheaper at 0.07% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOOG has performed better with a 17.80% return vs 12.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOOG is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IAU.

VOOG has the higher dividend yield at 0.45%, compared with 0.00% for IAU.

IAU is categorized as Gold, while VOOG is S&P 500. IAU tracks LBMA Gold Price, while VOOG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IAU and 0.07% for VOOG.

VOOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IAU and VOOG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer