IAU vs. VHT
IAU (iShares Gold Trust) and VHT (Vanguard Health Care ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IAU is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price, while VHT is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Health Care 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IAU returned 12.71%/yr vs 9.66%/yr for VHT. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IAU charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VHT.
Performance
IAU vs. VHT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IAU achieves a 0.26% return, which is significantly higher than VHT's -1.21% return. Over the past 10 years, IAU has outperformed VHT with an annualized return of 12.71%, while VHT has yielded a comparatively lower 9.66% annualized return.
IAU
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -8.43%
- YTD
- 0.26%
- 6M
- 3.08%
- 1Y
- 30.27%
- 3Y*
- 29.88%
- 5Y*
- 17.71%
- 10Y*
- 12.71%
VHT
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 5.33%
- YTD
- -1.21%
- 6M
- 0.70%
- 1Y
- 16.43%
- 3Y*
- 7.21%
- 5Y*
- 4.80%
- 10Y*
- 9.66%
IAU vs. VHT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAU iShares Gold Trust | 0.26% | 63.95% | 26.85% | 12.84% | -0.63% | -4.00% | 25.03% | 17.98% | -1.76% | 12.91% |
VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF | -1.21% | 15.46% | 2.66% | 2.52% | -5.60% | 20.57% | 18.29% | 21.87% | 5.58% | 23.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between IAU and VHT is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2005 | 0.04 |
The correlation between IAU and VHT shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (all time) to 0.19 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IAU vs. VHT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IAU
VHT
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Real Estate
IAU
VHT
-
Basic Materials
IAU
-
VHT
-
Communication Services
IAU
-
VHT
-
Consumer Cyclical
IAU
-
VHT
-
Consumer Defensive
IAU
-
VHT
-
Energy
IAU
-
VHT
-
Financial Services
IAU
-
VHT
Healthcare
IAU
-
VHT
Industrials
IAU
-
VHT
Technology
IAU
-
VHT
Utilities
IAU
-
VHT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IAU vs. VHT — Risk / Return Rank
IAU
VHT
IAU vs. VHT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Gold Trust (IAU) and Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IAU | VHT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.20 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.52 | 1.59 | -0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.80 | 3.95 | -0.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IAU | VHT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.14 | 1.13 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 | 0.32 | +0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 | 0.57 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.57 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
IAU vs. VHT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IAU drawdown since its inception was -45.14%, which is greater than VHT's maximum drawdown of -39.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAU and VHT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IAU | VHT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.14% | -39.12% | -6.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.04% | -10.40% | -9.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.04% | -16.91% | -3.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.93% | -17.71% | -3.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.82% | -28.85% | +7.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.88% | -4.34% | -15.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.97% | -5.99% | -9.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.99% | 4.17% | +3.82% |
Volatility
IAU vs. VHT - Volatility Comparison
iShares Gold Trust (IAU) has a higher volatility of 5.64% compared to Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) at 4.90%. This indicates that IAU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VHT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IAU | VHT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.64% | 4.90% | +0.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.33% | 10.45% | +12.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.68% | 14.64% | +12.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.02% | 15.02% | +3.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.94% | 16.97% | -1.03% |
IAU vs. VHT - Expense Ratio Comparison
IAU has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VHT's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IAU vs. VHT - Dividend Comparison
IAU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VHT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAU iShares Gold Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF | 1.66% | 1.61% | 1.53% | 1.36% | 1.33% | 1.14% | 1.21% | 1.89% | 1.38% | 1.31% | 1.45% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IAU and VHT have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IAU has higher volatility (5.64%) compared to VHT (4.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IAU dropped -45.14% vs VHT's -39.12%.
On 10-year performance, IAU leads with 12.71% vs 9.66% for VHT. On fees, VHT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VHT has been the lower-risk option at 4.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IAU has performed better with a 12.71% return vs 9.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VHT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IAU.
VHT has the higher dividend yield at 1.66%, compared with 0.00% for IAU.
IAU is categorized as Gold, while VHT is Health & Biotech Equities. IAU tracks LBMA Gold Price, while VHT tracks MSCI US Investable Market Health Care 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IAU and 0.09% for VHT.
IAU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IAU and VHT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer