IAGG vs. BBUS
IAGG (iShares Core International Aggregate Bond ETF) and BBUS (JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IAGG is a Global Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex USD 10% Issuer Capped (Hedged) Index, while BBUS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IAGG returned 1.05%/yr vs 13.01%/yr for BBUS. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IAGG charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for BBUS.
Performance
IAGG vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IAGG achieves a 0.72% return, which is significantly lower than BBUS's 8.45% return.
IAGG
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- YTD
- 0.72%
- 6M
- 0.87%
- 1Y
- 2.26%
- 3Y*
- 4.55%
- 5Y*
- 1.05%
- 10Y*
- 2.12%
BBUS
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- 8.45%
- 6M
- 8.40%
- 1Y
- 24.33%
- 3Y*
- 21.53%
- 5Y*
- 13.01%
- 10Y*
- —
IAGG vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAGG iShares Core International Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.72% | 3.26% | 4.51% | 8.49% | -10.86% | -1.87% | 4.63% | 6.00% |
BBUS JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 8.45% | 17.77% | 24.89% | 27.20% | -19.46% | 27.13% | 20.69% | 16.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between IAGG and BBUS is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2019 | 0.10 |
Over the past year, IAGG and BBUS have become more correlated (0.35) than their long-term average of 0.10, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IAGG vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank
IAGG
BBUS
IAGG vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core International Aggregate Bond ETF (IAGG) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IAGG | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.37 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.98 | 2.65 | -1.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.91 | 12.09 | -9.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IAGG | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 | 2.02 | -1.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 0.77 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.82 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
IAGG vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IAGG drawdown since its inception was -13.88%, smaller than the maximum BBUS drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAGG and BBUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IAGG | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.88% | -35.35% | +21.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.32% | -9.21% | +6.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.32% | -19.01% | +16.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.57% | -25.46% | +11.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -13.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.18% | -2.68% | +1.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.84% | -5.45% | +2.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.78% | 2.02% | -1.24% |
Volatility
IAGG vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core International Aggregate Bond ETF (IAGG) is 1.09%, while JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) has a volatility of 3.78%. This indicates that IAGG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IAGG | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.09% | 3.78% | -2.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.41% | 9.37% | -6.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.84% | 12.15% | -9.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.51% | 17.07% | -12.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.05% | 19.60% | -15.55% |
IAGG vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
IAGG has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IAGG vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison
IAGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.67%, more than BBUS's 1.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBUS JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 1.00% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.38% | 1.57% | 1.11% | 1.43% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IAGG iShares Core International Aggregate Bond ETF | 3.67% | 3.08% | 4.28% | 3.55% | 2.27% | 1.16% | 1.95% | 2.82% | 3.02% | 1.74% | 1.56% | 0.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IAGG and BBUS have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BBUS has higher volatility (3.78%) compared to IAGG (1.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IAGG dropped -13.88% vs BBUS's -35.35%.
On 5-year performance, BBUS leads with 13.01% vs 1.05% for IAGG. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, IAGG has been the lower-risk option at 1.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BBUS has performed better with a 13.01% return vs 1.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for IAGG.
IAGG has the higher dividend yield at 3.67%, compared with 1.00% for BBUS.
IAGG is categorized as Global Bonds, while BBUS is Large Cap Growth Equities. IAGG tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex USD 10% Issuer Capped (Hedged) Index, while BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IAGG and 0.02% for BBUS.
BBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IAGG and BBUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer