PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYMC vs. SAF.PA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HYMC vs. SAF.PA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC) and Safran SA (SAF.PA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HYMC is traded in USD, while SAF.PA is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the SAF.PA values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYMC achieves a 10.77% return, which is significantly higher than SAF.PA's 0.94% return.


HYMC

1D
-0.38%
1M
-31.50%
YTD
10.77%
6M
133.42%
1Y
506.68%
3Y*
101.80%
5Y*
-6.12%
10Y*

SAF.PA

1D
2.32%
1M
4.50%
YTD
0.94%
6M
2.71%
1Y
16.48%
3Y*
34.81%
5Y*
19.65%
10Y*
18.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYMC vs. SAF.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
HYMC
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation
10.77%975.57%-9.80%-53.96%-13.30%-92.18%-24.03%4.59%3.02%
SAF.PA
Safran SA
0.94%60.85%26.05%42.07%2.59%-13.17%-8.31%30.00%12.12%

Correlation

The correlation between HYMC and SAF.PA is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2018

0.11

The correlation between HYMC and SAF.PA shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (all time) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYMC vs. SAF.PA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYMC
HYMC Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
HYMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYMC Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
HYMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYMC Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

SAF.PA
SAF.PA Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
SAF.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAF.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAF.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
SAF.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAF.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYMC vs. SAF.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC) and Safran SA (SAF.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HYMCSAF.PADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.12

+0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.69

0.67

+9.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.66

1.80

+20.86

HYMC vs. SAF.PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYMC Sharpe Ratio is 4.28, which is higher than the SAF.PA Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYMC and SAF.PA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HYMCSAF.PADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.28

0.50

+3.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

0.64

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.12

0.45

-0.57

Drawdowns

HYMC vs. SAF.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYMC drawdown since its inception was -98.89%, which is greater than SAF.PA's maximum drawdown of -65.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYMC and SAF.PA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYMCSAF.PADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.89%

-65.85%

-33.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.76%

-24.21%

-28.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.45%

-24.21%

-39.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-95.18%

-41.46%

-53.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-83.36%

-13.82%

-69.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.35%

-13.89%

-49.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.51%

9.01%

+13.50%

Volatility

HYMC vs. SAF.PA - Volatility Comparison

Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC) has a higher volatility of 26.05% compared to Safran SA (SAF.PA) at 10.60%. This indicates that HYMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SAF.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYMCSAF.PADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.05%

10.60%

+15.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

94.84%

28.77%

+66.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

119.54%

32.42%

+87.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

152.53%

30.36%

+122.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

123.03%

34.60%

+88.43%

Dividends

HYMC vs. SAF.PA - Dividend Comparison

HYMC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SAF.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYMC
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SAF.PA
Safran SA
1.12%0.98%1.04%0.85%0.43%0.40%0.00%1.32%1.53%0.97%2.15%1.96%

Financials

HYMC vs. SAF.PA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation and Safran SA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. HYMC values in USD, SAF.PA values in EUR

Frequently Asked Questions


HYMC and SAF.PA have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYMC and SAF.PA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer