HYMC vs. KLAC
HYMC (Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation) and KLAC (KLA Corporation) are both stocks. HYMC operates in Gold (Basic Materials), while KLAC operates in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials (Technology). Over the past 5 years, HYMC returned -6.12%/yr vs 47.83%/yr for KLAC. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HYMC vs. KLAC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYMC achieves a 10.77% return, which is significantly lower than KLAC's 73.94% return.
HYMC
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- -31.50%
- YTD
- 10.77%
- 6M
- 133.42%
- 1Y
- 506.68%
- 3Y*
- 101.80%
- 5Y*
- -6.12%
- 10Y*
- —
KLAC
- 1D
- 9.27%
- 1M
- 12.92%
- YTD
- 73.94%
- 6M
- 72.59%
- 1Y
- 162.58%
- 3Y*
- 66.83%
- 5Y*
- 47.83%
- 10Y*
- 42.36%
HYMC vs. KLAC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYMC Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation | 10.77% | 975.57% | -9.80% | -53.96% | -13.30% | -92.18% | -24.03% | 4.59% | 3.02% |
KLAC KLA Corporation | 73.94% | 94.48% | 9.36% | 56.05% | -11.20% | 68.05% | 47.94% | 103.99% | -25.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYMC and KLAC is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2018 | 0.14 |
Fundamentals
HYMC:
$2.36B
KLAC:
$278.42B
HYMC:
-$1.64
KLAC:
$35.29
HYMC:
10.56
KLAC:
47.75
HYMC:
$0.00
KLAC:
$13.10B
HYMC:
-$4.65M
KLAC:
$8.09B
HYMC:
-$69.17M
KLAC:
$5.77B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYMC vs. KLAC — Risk / Return Rank
HYMC
KLAC
HYMC vs. KLAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC) and KLA Corporation (KLAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HYMC | KLAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.49 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.69 | 7.30 | +2.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.66 | 23.22 | -0.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HYMC | KLAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.28 | 3.43 | +0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.04 | 1.11 | -1.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.02 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.12 | 0.45 | -0.57 |
Drawdowns
HYMC vs. KLAC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYMC drawdown since its inception was -98.89%, which is greater than KLAC's maximum drawdown of -83.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYMC and KLAC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYMC | KLAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.89% | -83.74% | -15.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.76% | -22.41% | -30.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.45% | -34.95% | -28.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -95.18% | -40.28% | -54.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.28% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -83.36% | -1.08% | -82.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.35% | -29.34% | -34.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.51% | 7.03% | +15.48% |
Volatility
HYMC vs. KLAC - Volatility Comparison
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC) has a higher volatility of 26.05% compared to KLA Corporation (KLAC) at 19.61%. This indicates that HYMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KLAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYMC | KLAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 26.05% | 19.61% | +6.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 94.84% | 40.06% | +54.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 119.54% | 47.74% | +71.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 152.53% | 43.46% | +109.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 123.03% | 41.64% | +81.39% |
Dividends
HYMC vs. KLAC - Dividend Comparison
HYMC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KLAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYMC Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KLAC KLA Corporation | 0.38% | 0.61% | 0.96% | 0.92% | 1.25% | 0.91% | 1.35% | 1.74% | 3.17% | 2.15% | 2.67% | 2.94% |
Financials
HYMC vs. KLAC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation and KLA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
HYMC and KLAC have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HYMC has higher volatility (26.05%) compared to KLAC (19.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYMC dropped -98.89% vs KLAC's -83.74%.
HYMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.28 vs 3.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HYMC and KLAC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer