HYGI vs. MNA

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

HYGI (iShares Inflation Hedged High Yield Bond ETF) and MNA (IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HYGI is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the BlackRock Inflation Hedged High Yield Bond Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while MNA is a Hedge Fund fund tracking the IQ Merger Arbitrage Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HYGI charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for MNA.

Performance

HYGI vs. MNA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Inflation Hedged High Yield Bond ETF (HYGI) and IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF (MNA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

HYGI

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MNA

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: -0.14%
• YTD: 1.79%
• 6M: 1.97%
• 1Y: 4.47%
• 3Y*: 5.95%
• 5Y*: 1.83%
• 10Y*: 2.74%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYGI vs. MNA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
HYGI iShares Inflation Hedged High Yield Bond ETF	0.00%	6.20%	9.16%	11.71%	0.65%
MNA IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF	1.79%	8.59%	4.93%	0.18%	2.26%

Correlation

The correlation between HYGI and MNA is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.31
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2022	0.36

The correlation between HYGI and MNA shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.36 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HYGI vs. MNA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HYGI	MNA
Utilities	99.6%	15.3%
Real Estate	0.4%	5.1%
Basic Materials	-	10.3%
Communication Services	-	9.2%
Consumer Cyclical	-	2.4%
Consumer Defensive	-	4.4%
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	11.4%
Healthcare	-	11.3%
Industrials	-	22.3%
Technology	-	8.3%

Return for Risk

HYGI vs. MNA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MNA

MNA Risk / Return Rank: 41
MNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
MNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
MNA Omega Ratio Rank: 28
MNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
MNA Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYGI vs. MNA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Inflation Hedged High Yield Bond ETF (HYGI) and IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF (MNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HYGI	MNA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.95	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.37	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.42	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.36	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	HYGI	MNA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-16.68%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-1.40%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-3.01%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-10.45%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-16.68%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-0.55%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-2.83%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.56%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HYGI	MNA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.66%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	3.59%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	4.75%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	4.98%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	6.55%	—

HYGI vs. MNA - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYGI has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than MNA's 0.77% expense ratio.

Dividends

HYGI vs. MNA - Dividend Comparison

Neither HYGI nor MNA has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HYGI iShares Inflation Hedged High Yield Bond ETF	0.97%	3.41%	6.08%	6.22%	3.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MNA IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.20%	0.00%	0.00%	2.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.21%	0.87%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HYGI and MNA in my portfolio?

HYGI and MNA have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HYGI or MNA?

On fees, HYGI is cheaper at 0.52% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HYGI or MNA?

HYGI is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for MNA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HYGI or MNA?

HYGI has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.00% for MNA.

What is the main difference between HYGI and MNA?

HYGI is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while MNA is Hedge Fund. HYGI tracks BlackRock Inflation Hedged High Yield Bond Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while MNA tracks IQ Merger Arbitrage Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and New York Life. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for HYGI and 0.77% for MNA.