HYG vs. ICLN

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

HYG (iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and ICLN (iShares Global Clean Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HYG is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Markit iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield Index, while ICLN is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Clean Energy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HYG returned 4.88%/yr vs 11.27%/yr for ICLN. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HYG charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for ICLN.

Performance

HYG vs. ICLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYG achieves a 1.14% return, which is significantly lower than ICLN's 27.81% return. Over the past 10 years, HYG has underperformed ICLN with an annualized return of 4.88%, while ICLN has yielded a comparatively higher 11.27% annualized return.

HYG

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: -0.24%
• YTD: 1.14%
• 6M: 1.72%
• 1Y: 6.36%
• 3Y*: 8.34%
• 5Y*: 3.69%
• 10Y*: 4.88%

ICLN

• 1D: -1.50%
• 1M: -0.76%
• YTD: 27.81%
• 6M: 26.73%
• 1Y: 65.16%
• 3Y*: 5.80%
• 5Y*: 0.12%
• 10Y*: 11.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYG vs. ICLN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	1.14%	8.59%	7.97%	11.54%	-10.98%	3.76%	4.47%	14.09%	-2.02%	6.07%
ICLN iShares Global Clean Energy ETF	27.81%	47.05%	-25.72%	-20.41%	-5.43%	-24.18%	141.82%	44.36%	-9.03%	21.47%

Correlation

The correlation between HYG and ICLN is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.52
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2008	0.55

The correlation between HYG and ICLN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

HYG vs. ICLN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HYG	ICLN
Utilities	99.6%	32.8%
Real Estate	0.4%	-
Basic Materials	-	1.1%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	0.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	26.4%
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	27.8%
Technology	-	11.1%

Return for Risk

HYG vs. ICLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYG

HYG Risk / Return Rank: 60
HYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
HYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
HYG Omega Ratio Rank: 56
HYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
HYG Martin Ratio Rank: 71

ICLN

ICLN Risk / Return Rank: 80
ICLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
ICLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
ICLN Omega Ratio Rank: 70
ICLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
ICLN Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYG vs. ICLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HYG	ICLN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.67	2.38	-0.71
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.49	2.93	-0.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.37	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.73	5.66	-2.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.02	16.11	-4.09
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HYG vs. ICLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYG Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the ICLN Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYG and ICLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HYG	ICLN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.67	2.38	-0.71
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49	0.00	+0.49
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.59	0.41	+0.18
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.46	-0.09	+0.55

Drawdowns

HYG vs. ICLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYG drawdown since its inception was -34.25%, smaller than the maximum ICLN drawdown of -87.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYG and ICLN.

Drawdown Indicators

	HYG	ICLN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.25%	-87.15%	+52.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.34%	-11.58%	+9.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.56%	-43.18%	+38.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.79%	-57.16%	+41.37%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-22.03%	-66.75%	+44.72%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.45%	-42.82%	+42.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.24%	-66.59%	+63.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.53%	4.06%	-3.53%

Volatility

HYG vs. ICLN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) is 1.23%, while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) has a volatility of 12.28%. This indicates that HYG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HYG	ICLN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.23%	12.28%	-11.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.05%	21.81%	-18.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.84%	27.62%	-23.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.53%	27.43%	-19.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.29%	27.31%	-19.02%

HYG vs. ICLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than ICLN's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

HYG vs. ICLN - Dividend Comparison

HYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.93%, more than ICLN's 1.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	5.93%	5.71%	6.01%	5.74%	5.30%	4.02%	4.88%	4.99%	5.54%	5.12%	5.27%	5.90%
ICLN iShares Global Clean Energy ETF	1.28%	1.63%	1.85%	1.59%	0.89%	1.18%	0.34%	1.36%	2.77%	2.49%	3.88%	2.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HYG and ICLN in my portfolio?

HYG and ICLN have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HYG or ICLN?

ICLN has higher volatility (12.28%) compared to HYG (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYG dropped -34.25% vs ICLN's -87.15%.

Which ETF is better, HYG or ICLN?

On 10-year performance, ICLN leads with 11.27% vs 4.88% for HYG. On fees, ICLN is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, HYG has been the lower-risk option at 1.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HYG or ICLN?

Over the 10-year period, ICLN has performed better with a 11.27% return vs 4.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HYG or ICLN?

ICLN is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for HYG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HYG or ICLN?

HYG has the higher dividend yield at 5.93%, compared with 1.28% for ICLN.

What is the main difference between HYG and ICLN?

HYG is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while ICLN is Alternative Energy Equities. HYG tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield Index, while ICLN tracks S&P Global Clean Energy Index. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for HYG and 0.39% for ICLN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ICLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.