HYG vs. EWJ
HYG (iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and EWJ (iShares MSCI Japan ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HYG is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Markit iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield Index, while EWJ is a Japan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HYG returned 4.88%/yr vs 9.21%/yr for EWJ. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.49% expense ratio.
Performance
HYG vs. EWJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYG achieves a 1.14% return, which is significantly lower than EWJ's 13.88% return. Over the past 10 years, HYG has underperformed EWJ with an annualized return of 4.88%, while EWJ has yielded a comparatively higher 9.21% annualized return.
HYG
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -0.24%
- YTD
- 1.14%
- 6M
- 1.72%
- 1Y
- 6.36%
- 3Y*
- 8.34%
- 5Y*
- 3.69%
- 10Y*
- 4.88%
EWJ
- 1D
- 1.36%
- 1M
- -0.29%
- YTD
- 13.88%
- 6M
- 14.67%
- 1Y
- 30.27%
- 3Y*
- 17.05%
- 5Y*
- 8.50%
- 10Y*
- 9.21%
HYG vs. EWJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.14% | 8.59% | 7.97% | 11.54% | -10.98% | 3.76% | 4.47% | 14.09% | -2.02% | 6.07% |
EWJ iShares MSCI Japan ETF | 13.88% | 25.84% | 7.03% | 20.29% | -17.72% | 1.16% | 15.40% | 19.34% | -14.10% | 24.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYG and EWJ is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2007 | 0.52 |
The correlation between HYG and EWJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
HYG vs. EWJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HYG
EWJ
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
HYG
EWJ
Real Estate
HYG
EWJ
Basic Materials
HYG
-
EWJ
Communication Services
HYG
-
EWJ
Consumer Cyclical
HYG
-
EWJ
Consumer Defensive
HYG
-
EWJ
Energy
HYG
-
EWJ
Financial Services
HYG
-
EWJ
Healthcare
HYG
-
EWJ
Industrials
HYG
-
EWJ
Technology
HYG
-
EWJ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYG vs. EWJ — Risk / Return Rank
HYG
EWJ
HYG vs. EWJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) and iShares MSCI Japan ETF (EWJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HYG | EWJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.29 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.73 | 2.24 | +0.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.02 | 7.56 | +4.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HYG | EWJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.67 | 1.53 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.47 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.53 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.11 | +0.35 |
Drawdowns
HYG vs. EWJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYG drawdown since its inception was -34.25%, smaller than the maximum EWJ drawdown of -60.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYG and EWJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYG | EWJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.25% | -60.93% | +26.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.34% | -13.59% | +11.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.56% | -14.68% | +10.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.79% | -33.14% | +17.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.03% | -33.14% | +11.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.45% | -2.32% | +1.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.24% | -21.73% | +18.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.53% | 4.02% | -3.49% |
Volatility
HYG vs. EWJ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) is 1.23%, while iShares MSCI Japan ETF (EWJ) has a volatility of 5.21%. This indicates that HYG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYG | EWJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.23% | 5.21% | -3.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.05% | 15.51% | -12.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.84% | 19.89% | -16.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.53% | 18.31% | -10.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.29% | 17.31% | -9.02% |
HYG vs. EWJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both HYG and EWJ have an expense ratio of 0.49%.
Dividends
HYG vs. EWJ - Dividend Comparison
HYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.93%, more than EWJ's 3.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWJ iShares MSCI Japan ETF | 3.97% | 4.52% | 2.34% | 2.03% | 1.23% | 2.08% | 1.04% | 2.03% | 1.71% | 1.25% | 1.95% | 1.27% |
HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 5.93% | 5.71% | 6.01% | 5.74% | 5.30% | 4.02% | 4.88% | 4.99% | 5.54% | 5.12% | 5.27% | 5.90% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYG and EWJ have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWJ has higher volatility (5.21%) compared to HYG (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYG dropped -34.25% vs EWJ's -60.93%.
On 10-year performance, EWJ leads with 9.21% vs 4.88% for HYG. Both ETFs have the same 0.49% expense ratio. On volatility, HYG has been the lower-risk option at 1.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EWJ has performed better with a 9.21% return vs 4.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HYG and EWJ have the same expense ratio: 0.49% per year.
HYG has the higher dividend yield at 5.93%, compared with 3.97% for EWJ.
HYG is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while EWJ is Japan Equities. HYG tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield Index, while EWJ tracks MSCI Japan Index.
HYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HYG and EWJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer