PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HWM vs. AAPL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HWM vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM) and Apple Inc (AAPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HWM achieves a 20.38% return, which is significantly higher than AAPL's 11.12% return. Over the past 10 years, HWM has outperformed AAPL with an annualized return of 31.79%, while AAPL has yielded a comparatively lower 29.63% annualized return.


HWM

1D
-2.12%
1M
-8.87%
YTD
20.38%
6M
27.45%
1Y
40.91%
3Y*
75.58%
5Y*
48.17%
10Y*
31.79%

AAPL

1D
-1.89%
1M
2.90%
YTD
11.12%
6M
8.71%
1Y
48.46%
3Y*
19.11%
5Y*
19.46%
10Y*
29.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HWM vs. AAPL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HWM
Howmet Aerospace Inc.
20.38%87.95%102.71%37.84%24.16%11.67%21.03%83.54%-37.43%48.40%
AAPL
Apple Inc
11.12%9.05%30.71%49.01%-26.40%34.65%82.31%88.96%-5.39%48.46%

Correlation

The correlation between HWM and AAPL is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 1980

0.25

The correlation between HWM and AAPL shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.32 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HWM:

$99.36B

AAPL:

$4.45T

EPS

HWM:

$4.31

AAPL:

$8.24

PE Ratio

HWM:

57.22

AAPL:

36.61

PEG Ratio

HWM:

0.97

AAPL:

4.82

PS Ratio

HWM:

11.57

AAPL:

9.94

PB Ratio

HWM:

17.99

AAPL:

41.82

Total Revenue (TTM)

HWM:

$8.62B

AAPL:

$451.44B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HWM:

$2.81B

AAPL:

$216.07B

EBITDA (TTM)

HWM:

$2.66B

AAPL:

$153.63B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HWM vs. AAPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HWM
HWM Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
HWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
HWM Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
HWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
HWM Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

AAPL
AAPL Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
AAPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPL Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPL Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HWM vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HWMAAPLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.39

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

3.53

-0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.37

8.89

-1.52

HWM vs. AAPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HWM Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is lower than the AAPL Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HWM and AAPL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HWMAAPLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.34

2.18

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.51

0.71

+0.80

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

1.03

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.44

-0.23

Drawdowns

HWM vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HWM drawdown since its inception was -88.30%, which is greater than AAPL's maximum drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HWM and AAPL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HWMAAPLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.30%

-81.80%

-6.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.89%

-13.80%

-2.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.41%

-33.36%

+13.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.40%

-33.36%

+10.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.81%

-38.52%

-26.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.88%

-4.33%

-5.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.01%

-29.60%

-1.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.58%

5.48%

+0.10%

Volatility

HWM vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison

Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM) has a higher volatility of 7.62% compared to Apple Inc (AAPL) at 5.68%. This indicates that HWM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HWMAAPLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.62%

5.68%

+1.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.08%

15.99%

+8.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.70%

22.41%

+8.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.04%

27.47%

+4.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.78%

28.91%

+10.87%

Dividends

HWM vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison

HWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than AAPL's 0.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAPL
Apple Inc
0.35%0.38%0.40%0.49%0.70%0.49%0.61%1.04%1.79%1.45%1.93%1.93%
HWM
Howmet Aerospace Inc.
0.19%0.21%0.24%0.31%0.25%0.13%0.05%0.39%1.42%0.88%40.49%1.22%

Financials

HWM vs. AAPL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Howmet Aerospace Inc. and Apple Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B20222023202420252026
2.31B
111.18B
(HWM) Total Revenue
(AAPL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

HWM vs. AAPL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Howmet Aerospace Inc. and Apple Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
36.9%
49.3%
Portfolio components
HWM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Howmet Aerospace Inc. reported a gross profit of 854.00M and revenue of 2.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.

AAPL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported a gross profit of 54.78B and revenue of 111.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.3%.

HWM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Howmet Aerospace Inc. reported an operating income of 734.00M and revenue of 2.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.7%.

AAPL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported an operating income of 35.89B and revenue of 111.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.3%.

HWM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Howmet Aerospace Inc. reported a net income of 580.00M and revenue of 2.31B, resulting in a net margin of 25.1%.

AAPL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported a net income of 29.58B and revenue of 111.18B, resulting in a net margin of 26.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


HWM and AAPL have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HWM has higher volatility (7.62%) compared to AAPL (5.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HWM dropped -88.30% vs AAPL's -81.80%.

AAPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HWM and AAPL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer