HUBS vs. MUFG
HUBS (HubSpot, Inc.) and MUFG (Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.) are both stocks. HUBS operates in Software - Application (Technology), while MUFG operates in Banks - Diversified (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, HUBS returned 15.55%/yr vs 17.84%/yr for MUFG. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HUBS vs. MUFG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HUBS achieves a -48.14% return, which is significantly lower than MUFG's 25.60% return. Over the past 10 years, HUBS has underperformed MUFG with an annualized return of 15.55%, while MUFG has yielded a comparatively higher 17.84% annualized return.
HUBS
- 1D
- -2.13%
- 1M
- 5.46%
- YTD
- -48.14%
- 6M
- -45.97%
- 1Y
- -65.85%
- 3Y*
- -26.16%
- 5Y*
- -15.99%
- 10Y*
- 15.55%
MUFG
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 10.97%
- YTD
- 25.60%
- 6M
- 25.13%
- 1Y
- 46.00%
- 3Y*
- 45.96%
- 5Y*
- 32.45%
- 10Y*
- 17.84%
HUBS vs. MUFG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUBS HubSpot, Inc. | -48.14% | -42.41% | 20.02% | 100.79% | -56.14% | 66.27% | 150.12% | 26.06% | 42.23% | 88.09% |
MUFG Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. | 25.60% | 39.96% | 40.10% | 33.50% | 27.37% | 25.70% | -15.99% | 11.50% | -33.01% | 20.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between HUBS and MUFG is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2014 | 0.18 |
The correlation between HUBS and MUFG shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
HUBS:
$10.94B
MUFG:
$222.81B
HUBS:
$1.91
MUFG:
$214.15
HUBS:
109.24
MUFG:
0.09
HUBS:
0.12
MUFG:
0.00
HUBS:
3.32
MUFG:
0.02
HUBS:
5.48
MUFG:
0.01
HUBS:
$3.30B
MUFG:
$13.21T
HUBS:
$2.76B
MUFG:
$7.24T
HUBS:
$196.96M
MUFG:
$3.34T
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HUBS vs. MUFG — Risk / Return Rank
HUBS
MUFG
HUBS vs. MUFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. (MUFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HUBS | MUFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | 1.30 | -0.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.94 | 2.67 | -3.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.54 | 7.49 | -9.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HUBS | MUFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.05 | 1.79 | -2.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.29 | 1.12 | -1.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | 0.64 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.18 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
HUBS vs. MUFG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HUBS drawdown since its inception was -78.99%, roughly equal to the maximum MUFG drawdown of -76.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUBS and MUFG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HUBS | MUFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.99% | -76.75% | -2.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -70.46% | -17.28% | -53.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -78.16% | -26.56% | -51.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -78.99% | -32.81% | -46.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -78.99% | -57.62% | -21.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -75.58% | -0.65% | -74.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.12% | -43.56% | +20.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 43.11% | 6.16% | +36.95% |
Volatility
HUBS vs. MUFG - Volatility Comparison
HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) has a higher volatility of 34.87% compared to Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. (MUFG) at 5.66%. This indicates that HUBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MUFG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HUBS | MUFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 34.87% | 5.66% | +29.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.81% | 19.14% | +35.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 62.92% | 25.83% | +37.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.00% | 29.05% | +25.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.96% | 27.88% | +23.08% |
Dividends
HUBS vs. MUFG - Dividend Comparison
HUBS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MUFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUBS HubSpot, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MUFG Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. | 1.13% | 3.12% | 2.50% | 2.90% | 3.36% | 2.18% | 2.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.20% | 2.70% | 2.34% |
Financials
HUBS vs. MUFG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between HubSpot, Inc. and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
HUBS vs. MUFG - Profitability Comparison
HUBS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HubSpot, Inc. reported a gross profit of 735.30M and revenue of 881.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 83.5%.
MUFG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.09T and revenue of 3.59T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.3%.
HUBS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HubSpot, Inc. reported an operating income of 27.94M and revenue of 881.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.2%.
MUFG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 841.39B and revenue of 3.59T, resulting in an operating margin of 23.4%.
HUBS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HubSpot, Inc. reported a net income of 32.55M and revenue of 881.00M, resulting in a net margin of 3.7%.
MUFG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. reported a net income of 624.99B and revenue of 3.59T, resulting in a net margin of 17.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
HUBS and MUFG have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HUBS has higher volatility (34.87%) compared to MUFG (5.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HUBS dropped -78.99% vs MUFG's -76.75%.
MUFG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs -1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HUBS and MUFG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer