HSHP vs. KEN
HSHP (Himalaya Shipping Ltd.) and KEN (Kenon Holdings Ltd.) are both stocks. HSHP operates in Marine Shipping (Industrials), while KEN operates in Utilities - Regulated Electric (Utilities). Over the past 3 years, HSHP returned 43.10%/yr vs 61.79%/yr for KEN. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HSHP vs. KEN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HSHP achieves a 61.31% return, which is significantly higher than KEN's 20.71% return.
HSHP
- 1D
- -1.98%
- 1M
- -10.85%
- YTD
- 61.31%
- 6M
- 56.39%
- 1Y
- 141.97%
- 3Y*
- 43.10%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KEN
- 1D
- 1.93%
- 1M
- -13.88%
- YTD
- 20.71%
- 6M
- 30.64%
- 1Y
- 116.81%
- 3Y*
- 61.79%
- 5Y*
- 34.36%
- 10Y*
- 42.04%
HSHP vs. KEN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSHP Himalaya Shipping Ltd. | 61.31% | 96.10% | -23.53% | 37.12% | -1.96% |
KEN Kenon Holdings Ltd. | 20.71% | 126.18% | 62.44% | -19.16% | -13.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between HSHP and KEN is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2022 | 0.13 |
Fundamentals
HSHP:
$673.76M
KEN:
$4.06B
HSHP:
$0.63
KEN:
$1.54
HSHP:
22.85
KEN:
49.63
HSHP:
0.04
KEN:
8.33
HSHP:
4.63
KEN:
4.01
HSHP:
4.32
KEN:
2.71
HSHP:
$143.50M
KEN:
$1.01B
HSHP:
$98.40M
KEN:
$166.82M
HSHP:
$101.44M
KEN:
$339.95M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HSHP vs. KEN — Risk / Return Rank
HSHP
KEN
HSHP vs. KEN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Himalaya Shipping Ltd. (HSHP) and Kenon Holdings Ltd. (KEN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HSHP | KEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.44 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.17 | 5.49 | +3.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.02 | 19.50 | +1.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HSHP | KEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.61 | 3.01 | +0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 0.75 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
HSHP vs. KEN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HSHP drawdown since its inception was -51.51%, smaller than the maximum KEN drawdown of -69.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSHP and KEN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HSHP | KEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.51% | -69.20% | +17.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.57% | -21.39% | +5.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.51% | -32.27% | -19.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -69.20% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -69.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.85% | -19.88% | +9.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.81% | -23.18% | +8.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.78% | 6.02% | +0.76% |
Volatility
HSHP vs. KEN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Himalaya Shipping Ltd. (HSHP) is 13.05%, while Kenon Holdings Ltd. (KEN) has a volatility of 14.44%. This indicates that HSHP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KEN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HSHP | KEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.05% | 14.44% | -1.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.58% | 29.95% | +0.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.64% | 39.14% | +0.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.59% | 39.77% | +2.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.59% | 41.90% | +0.69% |
Dividends
HSHP vs. KEN - Dividend Comparison
HSHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.04%, less than KEN's 5.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSHP Himalaya Shipping Ltd. | 4.04% | 3.57% | 9.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KEN Kenon Holdings Ltd. | 5.03% | 7.24% | 11.18% | 11.46% | 25.00% | 7.35% | 7.41% | 5.75% | 96.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 45.52% |
Financials
HSHP vs. KEN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Himalaya Shipping Ltd. and Kenon Holdings Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
HSHP vs. KEN - Profitability Comparison
HSHP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Himalaya Shipping Ltd. reported a gross profit of 18.40M and revenue of 33.60M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.8%.
KEN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kenon Holdings Ltd. reported a gross profit of 47.00M and revenue of 317.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.8%.
HSHP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Himalaya Shipping Ltd. reported an operating income of 17.20M and revenue of 33.60M, resulting in an operating margin of 51.2%.
KEN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kenon Holdings Ltd. reported an operating income of 4.00M and revenue of 317.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.3%.
HSHP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Himalaya Shipping Ltd. reported a net income of 5.00M and revenue of 33.60M, resulting in a net margin of 14.9%.
KEN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kenon Holdings Ltd. reported a net income of 26.00M and revenue of 317.00M, resulting in a net margin of 8.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
HSHP and KEN have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KEN has higher volatility (14.44%) compared to HSHP (13.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HSHP dropped -51.51% vs KEN's -69.20%.
HSHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.61 vs 3.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HSHP and KEN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer