HSHP vs. HYMC
HSHP (Himalaya Shipping Ltd.) and HYMC (Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation) are both stocks. HSHP operates in Marine Shipping (Industrials), while HYMC operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 3 years, HSHP returned 43.10%/yr vs 101.80%/yr for HYMC. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HSHP vs. HYMC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HSHP achieves a 61.31% return, which is significantly higher than HYMC's 10.77% return.
HSHP
- 1D
- -1.98%
- 1M
- -10.85%
- YTD
- 61.31%
- 6M
- 56.39%
- 1Y
- 141.97%
- 3Y*
- 43.10%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYMC
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- -31.50%
- YTD
- 10.77%
- 6M
- 133.42%
- 1Y
- 506.68%
- 3Y*
- 101.80%
- 5Y*
- -6.12%
- 10Y*
- —
HSHP vs. HYMC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSHP Himalaya Shipping Ltd. | 61.31% | 96.10% | -23.53% | 37.12% | -1.96% |
HYMC Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation | 10.77% | 975.57% | -9.80% | -53.96% | -17.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between HSHP and HYMC is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2022 | 0.14 |
Fundamentals
HSHP:
$673.76M
HYMC:
$2.36B
HSHP:
$0.63
HYMC:
-$1.64
HSHP:
4.32
HYMC:
10.56
HSHP:
$143.50M
HYMC:
$0.00
HSHP:
$98.40M
HYMC:
-$4.65M
HSHP:
$101.44M
HYMC:
-$69.17M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HSHP vs. HYMC — Risk / Return Rank
HSHP
HYMC
HSHP vs. HYMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Himalaya Shipping Ltd. (HSHP) and Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HSHP | HYMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.46 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.17 | 9.69 | -0.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.02 | 22.66 | -1.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HSHP | HYMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.61 | 4.28 | -0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | -0.12 | +1.03 |
Drawdowns
HSHP vs. HYMC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HSHP drawdown since its inception was -51.51%, smaller than the maximum HYMC drawdown of -98.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSHP and HYMC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HSHP | HYMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.51% | -98.89% | +47.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.57% | -52.76% | +37.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.51% | -63.45% | +11.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -95.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.85% | -83.36% | +72.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.81% | -63.35% | +48.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.78% | 22.51% | -15.73% |
Volatility
HSHP vs. HYMC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Himalaya Shipping Ltd. (HSHP) is 13.05%, while Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC) has a volatility of 26.05%. This indicates that HSHP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HSHP | HYMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.05% | 26.05% | -13.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.58% | 94.84% | -64.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.64% | 119.54% | -79.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.59% | 152.53% | -109.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.59% | 123.03% | -80.44% |
Dividends
HSHP vs. HYMC - Dividend Comparison
HSHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.04%, while HYMC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
HSHP Himalaya Shipping Ltd. | 4.04% | 3.57% | 9.88% |
HYMC Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
HSHP vs. HYMC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Himalaya Shipping Ltd. and Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
HSHP and HYMC have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HYMC has higher volatility (26.05%) compared to HSHP (13.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HSHP dropped -51.51% vs HYMC's -98.89%.
HYMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.28 vs 3.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HSHP and HYMC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer