PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HSBA.L vs. SHEL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HSBA.L vs. SHEL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC Holdings plc (HSBA.L) and Shell plc (SHEL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HSBA.L is traded in GBp, while SHEL is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SHEL values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with HSBA.L having a 20.63% return and SHEL slightly higher at 21.27%. Over the past 10 years, HSBA.L has outperformed SHEL with an annualized return of 18.05%, while SHEL has yielded a comparatively lower 10.76% annualized return.


HSBA.L

1D
0.76%
1M
4.48%
YTD
20.63%
6M
33.00%
1Y
62.97%
3Y*
40.74%
5Y*
33.67%
10Y*
18.05%

SHEL

1D
1.43%
1M
6.38%
YTD
21.27%
6M
21.19%
1Y
34.10%
3Y*
16.37%
5Y*
24.40%
10Y*
10.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HSBA.L vs. SHEL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HSBA.L
HSBC Holdings plc
20.63%57.77%36.43%32.14%19.91%22.90%-35.99%-2.41%-11.05%23.54%
SHEL
Shell plc
21.27%13.46%0.86%14.19%52.37%35.54%-42.81%2.33%-1.73%11.15%

Correlation

The correlation between HSBA.L and SHEL is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2007

0.34

The correlation between HSBA.L and SHEL shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HSBA.L:

£237.12B

SHEL:

$247.11B

EPS

HSBA.L:

£1.27

SHEL:

$6.39

PE Ratio

HSBA.L:

10.80

SHEL:

13.55

PEG Ratio

HSBA.L:

0.52

SHEL:

0.68

PS Ratio

HSBA.L:

1.91

SHEL:

0.95

PB Ratio

HSBA.L:

1.36

SHEL:

1.42

Total Revenue (TTM)

HSBA.L:

£125.68B

SHEL:

$266.82B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HSBA.L:

£61.95B

SHEL:

$41.65B

EBITDA (TTM)

HSBA.L:

£31.98B

SHEL:

$57.44B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HSBA.L vs. SHEL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HSBA.L
HSBA.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
HSBA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSBA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSBA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
HSBA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSBA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

SHEL
SHEL Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
SHEL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHEL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHEL Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
SHEL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHEL Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSBA.L vs. SHEL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC Holdings plc (HSBA.L) and Shell plc (SHEL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HSBA.LSHELDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.28

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.93

2.63

+1.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.65

7.22

+7.43

HSBA.L vs. SHEL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HSBA.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is higher than the SHEL Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSBA.L and SHEL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HSBA.LSHELDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49

1.61

+0.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.37

1.01

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.36

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.26

-0.04

Drawdowns

HSBA.L vs. SHEL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSBA.L drawdown since its inception was -66.05%, roughly equal to the maximum SHEL drawdown of -67.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSBA.L and SHEL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HSBA.LSHELDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.05%

-67.04%

+0.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.96%

-13.00%

-2.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.98%

-18.89%

-3.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.98%

-20.17%

-1.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.96%

-67.04%

+7.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.74%

-7.45%

+4.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.74%

-13.36%

-5.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.27%

4.73%

-0.46%

Volatility

HSBA.L vs. SHEL - Volatility Comparison

HSBC Holdings plc (HSBA.L) has a higher volatility of 5.97% compared to Shell plc (SHEL) at 5.63%. This indicates that HSBA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHEL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HSBA.LSHELDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.97%

5.63%

+0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.94%

17.42%

+3.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.25%

21.36%

+3.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.59%

24.17%

+0.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.77%

29.95%

-5.18%

Dividends

HSBA.L vs. SHEL - Dividend Comparison

HSBA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.06%, more than SHEL's 3.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HSBA.L
HSBC Holdings plc
4.06%4.28%8.28%6.80%4.11%3.54%0.00%6.79%5.83%5.18%0.00%0.00%
SHEL
Shell plc
3.41%3.90%4.39%3.76%3.48%3.78%5.69%6.27%6.27%2.75%6.49%8.17%

Financials

HSBA.L vs. SHEL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between HSBC Holdings plc and Shell plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


20.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B20222023202420252026
31.56B
69.57B
(HSBA.L) Total Revenue
(SHEL) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. HSBA.L values in GBp, SHEL values in USD

HSBA.L vs. SHEL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between HSBC Holdings plc and Shell plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
50.4%
19.1%
Portfolio components
HSBA.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HSBC Holdings plc reported a gross profit of 15.89B and revenue of 31.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.4%.

SHEL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Shell plc reported a gross profit of 13.31B and revenue of 69.57B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.1%.

HSBA.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HSBC Holdings plc reported an operating income of 9.18B and revenue of 31.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.1%.

SHEL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Shell plc reported an operating income of 10.35B and revenue of 69.57B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.9%.

HSBA.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HSBC Holdings plc reported a net income of 7.19B and revenue of 31.56B, resulting in a net margin of 22.8%.

SHEL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Shell plc reported a net income of 5.68B and revenue of 69.57B, resulting in a net margin of 8.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


HSBA.L and SHEL have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HSBA.L and SHEL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer